freaky deaky
spooky dybbuk box or bullshit artist? you decide.
Filed under
5 Responses to “freaky deaky”
Leave a Reply
If your comment does not immediately appear, do not freak out and repost your message a dozen times. Please note that all new visitors must have their first comment approved by the editor, and you must provide a legitimate e-mail address and use the same username for the system to "remember" you. The editor maintains the right to refuse comments deemed inappropriate or unhelpful. Users who repeatedly delve into ad hominem attacks or other troll-like behavior will be banned.
Trackback (Right-click & 'Copy Link...') | Comments RSS
Well if it’s just a story, at least it’s an amusing one.
—Renaissance · July 31st, 2003 at 8:10 am
i must admit i was hanging on every word, but… this is phony baloney. eBay just doesn’t keep listings up for that long (it was from june). fun to read though.
—barbara · August 2nd, 2003 at 5:39 am
could have been worse. what if, it was a Golem?
Otherwise, gotta agree total bullshit..
—Anonymous · August 2nd, 2003 at 5:44 am
There is nothing within Jewish text or tradition that could suggest or verify any of the claims or “customs” mentioned in the ad. Very creative though. I would say that this person has a future in horror writing. The story itself though may be interesting to analyze - where did the dibbuk go if it was in there?
—PeaceBear · August 5th, 2003 at 9:56 am
the use of the word keselim was interesting. the only meaning of the word that i can think of is “fools”, impleing lack of conciousness or concern. fools?
the engraving of the shma on the back is also decidedly un mystical as any kind of a binding spell. the divine name of god isn’t even spelled out all the way, let alone any binding names! just the abreveated YY used in prayer books sometimes when they want to be less holy.
cat urine. hmmm…
—yoseph crack · August 11th, 2003 at 10:26 pm