Gaza flotilla’s and Israel’s allies talespin to suit their agendas

What is grating on my nerves about the Freedom Flotilla matters now that the passengers have been unloaded in Ashdod is the rhetoric around the event. Chillul Who said it well: You can trust both sides to tell only the truths that paint them in the best light. Call me a liberal, but the pursuit of truth was always more important than the selective release of peices of the truth to get what you want.

In opposing efforts to show their separate causes in the best light, supporters of the Israeli government and Palestinian activists are inventing facts and distorting international law to suit their agendas.

Take for example the American Jewish Committee’s official statement: it calls the flotilla “pro-Hamas” and claims they exist “to bolster the despotic Hamas regime and its Muslim Brotherhood support base in Turkey and elsewhere.” One can accuse the Free Gaza Movement of happily singling Israel for condemnation and turning a blind eye to Hamas’ crimes. But the Free Gaza operation was created and launched by secular, Palestinian solidarity Europeans, not the Turkish Muslim Brotherhood.

Elsewhere in the same statement, the AJC asserts erroneously that the IDF encountered “automatic weapons” upon arrival. No source, by either IDF or media outlet, has made such a claim. The IDF press office has released photos of improvised weapons, but no guns. Reportedly, two guns stolen from Israeli soldiers were found later. Israel no doubt was expecting (hoping?) to find guns and rocket-building materials on board. But so far, the flotilla had no guns.

What does the AJC think they’re doing by inventing facts?

On the other side is the assertion that Israel conducted “piracy” in international waters. The legal status of Israel’s operation is open to question. The UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea (of which Israel is not a signatory) largely steers clear of regulating armed conflict. It does allow “hot pursuit” of ships near territorial waters and states are excluded from piracy charges. And various laws of war have long recognized naval blockades in international waters as legal.

Yet in international waters, boats are subject to the jurisdiction of their sovereign. In this case, the boats are Turkish, meaning Turkey has the right to demand the Israeli soldiers be extradited on murder charges under Turkish law in a Turkish court. Alternately, although states are excluded from piracy charges, boarding another nation’s boat could legitimately be classified as an act of war. Furthermore, the goods were delivered to Gaza and not confiscated for Israel’s benefit.

But regardless, piracy this is not. Outrageous, yes. Piracy, no.

In the case of the organized Jewish community, the Freedom Flotilla and their respective boosters, truth is an inconvenient obstacle on the march to ultimate victory.

12 Responses to “Gaza flotilla’s and Israel’s allies talespin to suit their agendas”


    The activists are pathological liars.

    You are making this to complicated for yourself. The answer is very simple. The activities L-I-E-D. They LIED.

    anon · June 1st, 2010 at 7:55 pm
  2. anon-
    Even if history will one day view this week’s events as the beginning of the end of the State of Israel, at least we’ll have the comfort of knowing that some activists lied.

    BZ · June 1st, 2010 at 8:06 pm
  3. Lied about what?

    Kung Fu Jew 18 · June 1st, 2010 at 9:59 pm
  4. 1/ Apparently these ‘secular Palestinian soliarity Europeans’ like singing ‘Kaybar, Kaybar, ya Yahud’

    2/ Lied about what? Google “Amy Goodman” “Adam Shapiro” “Democracy Now” and read about how the Israeli soldiers started firing as they got on the boat.

    Dave Boxthorn · June 1st, 2010 at 10:28 pm
  5. San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, 12 June 1994, available at


    Neutral merchant vessels

    67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:

    (a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture;

    Jacob · June 1st, 2010 at 11:35 pm
  6. I don’t intend to pass judgement until I’ve seen the evidence. YouTube clips are rarely sufficient alone and I’ve not seen any that’s a smoking gun.

    Kung Fu Jew 18 · June 1st, 2010 at 11:40 pm
  7. Even if history will one day view this week’s events as the beginning of the end of the State of Israel, at least we’ll have the comfort of knowing that some activists lied.
    —BZ · June 1st, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    Merely “the end of the State of Israel”? Don’t you mean the end of the region? The continent? The WORLD???

    Feelin’ a flair for drama tonight BZ? Heck, there’s barely a year and a half till the start of 2012 anyhow…

    Eric · June 2nd, 2010 at 12:26 am
  8. It seems the the San Remo Manual quoted above isn’t actually a treaty or any sort of legally binding document, is it?

    kyleb · June 2nd, 2010 at 12:27 am
  9. Kyleb – the San Remo Manual is a restatement of the areas of the law of naval warfare where there is broad international consensus. Promulgated by the International Red Cross, it is not binding positive law but it represents the state of customary international law.


    Jacob · June 2nd, 2010 at 6:33 am
  10. Leaving my own opinions aside, it’s a bit of a stretch to say this was done by “secular, Palestinian solidarity Europeans.” I’ll note even at the link you sent, 4 of the 8 people on the board of directors say that have USA citizenship or at least affiliation. Most board members are listed as having a direct familial connection to the middle east.

    Also note this quote:
    …Greta Berlin, the group’s 69-year-old co-founder and spokeswoman…
    Ms. Berlin, the outspoken co-founder, is originally from Los Angeles. She was married for 14 years to a Palestinian, with whom she had two children, and for 14 years to an American Jew. She likes to joke and says that makes her the most qualified “anti-Semite.”
    But when she is not joking she says that her detractors in Israel are right, that she does not accept Israel as a Jewish state, though she contends that is part of a larger philosophy which opposes all national borders.
    “You decide in your life what you are passionate about,” she said. “I happen to be passionate about the Palestinians who have had no rights since 1948.”

    Dan · June 2nd, 2010 at 10:45 am
  11. KFJ, this is for you – creative problem solving.

    Anonymouse · June 2nd, 2010 at 1:42 pm
  12. [...] what we’ve already said here at [...]

    The Further Adventures of the Fantastic Flotilla! | Jewschool · June 2nd, 2010 at 3:43 pm

Leave a Reply

If your comment does not immediately appear, do not freak out and repost your message a dozen times. Please note that all new visitors must have their first comment approved by the editor, and you must provide a legitimate e-mail address and use the same username for the system to "remember" you. The editor maintains the right to refuse comments deemed inappropriate or unhelpful. Users who repeatedly delve into ad hominem attacks or other troll-like behavior will be banned.

Trackback (Right-click & 'Copy Link...') | Comments RSS

"I may attack a certain point of view which I consider false, but I will never attack a person who preaches it. I have always a high regard for the individual who is honest and moral, even when I am not in agreement with him. Such a relation is in accord with the concept of kavod habriyot, for beloved is man for he is created in the image of God." —Rav Joseph Soloveitchik