The Bedouin of Anatevka

This is a guest post by Jesse Paikin. Jesse is a rabbinical student at Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion, where he has also received a Graduate Certificate in Jewish Education. Before attending HUC-JIR, he worked for a Jewish nonprofit, running educational youth travel programs around the world. He currently lives in Jerusalem and also blogs at and The Times of Israel. Follow him at @jessepaikin.

Unrecognized Bedouin Village, Negev Desert, October 2013

Israel’s Negev Desert is not a hospitable place. Vast, dusty, and scorching hot, it takes a great deal of effort to live on this land. Yet it was out of this very land that the Jewish people emerged, and from which the modern State of Israel was birthed. Anyone who has walked its canyons can attest to the feeling of ancient history pulsing out of the stones. Anyone who has laid their head down on the rocky bed and gazed up at the bowl of stars has felt the awe-inspiring power that emanates here. This is the place of the still, small voice.

David Ben-Gurion said that it is in the Negev that the creativity, vigor, and spirit of Israel will be tested. He prophesied that it would be there that the standing of Israel in the history of humankind would be determined (“The Significance of the Negev,” 1955)

Perhaps he was more correct than he knew. Today, close to 60 years after Ben-Gurion presciently spoke of the relevance of the desert, Israel faces a monumental test in this place. Israel’s treatment of its Negev Bedouin population is a trial that has the potential to unravel the dream Ben-Gurion envisioned over half a century ago. The Negev is not only the place where the creativity, vigor, and spirit of Israel are tested; it is the place where the conscience, values, and social values of Israel are being tested today.

What is happening in the Negev? Here are a few facts on the ground – the desert floor, as it were:

  • Bedouins comprise more than 25% of the population of the Negev, yet have lived on only 5% of the land since before 1948.
  • In 1948, Israel forcibly created a confinement area in the Negev known as the Siyag (enclosure/fence). Bedouin who didn’t live inside of the Siyag were forced into it. Subsequently, the government zoned the area for military and agricultural purposes, and those living in the Siyag lost their legitimate land claims, even if they predated the founding of the State of Israel.
  • Israel upholds that many of the Bedouin lack deeds affirming their land ownership, but those who were moved into Siyag weren’t given any land claims. Furthermore, many have claims to land outside of the Siyag that predate the State’s founding, when ownership was traditionally based on oral agreements – these understandings were accepted by and predate Ottoman and British control.
  • In the 1960s, half of the Bedouin population was moved out of their rural communities and into seven urban towns set up by the government. Over 75% of the remaining villages were unrecognized by the government, and thus do not receive any public services – water, sanitation, or electricity.
  • Now, the Knesset is set to approve the Prawer-Begin Plan, which will displace 30,000-40,000 Bedouins and demolish their homes.

How can we respond to this situation? Like most things in Israel, it may be viewed from a number of paradigms. Politically, it is crucial to understand that this is not simply a matter of people alleged to be living illegally on land in unrecognized communities; Israel itself created the legal “status” of the Bedouin communities and imposed it on them. Much like the desert land itself, this is a rocky and precarious situation.

More importantly, this is clearly an issue of basic human rights. As a rabbinical student, this is the most pressing paradigm for me. There is no dearth of Jewish commentary on human rights and the paramount supremacy of protecting the rights of the strangers living under Jewish rule. Yet perhaps the most pointed call for the need for Jews to protect the rights of the Bedouin comes not from our ancient texts, but from a rather unlikely source…

Summoning the voice of the fictional Tevye, actor Theodore Bikel recently called on us to not forget the lessons of life in the shtetl. He passionately and poignantly shared: “What hurts is the fact that the very people who are telling them [the Bedouin] to ‘Get out’ are the descendents of the people of Anatevka. My people.”

With the pleas of Tevye in my mind, I have added my name to a petition to the Israel government from 780 other clergy members and clergy-in-training to protect the basic human rights of the Bedouin. The petition and letter from Rabbis for Human Rights and T’ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights, calls on Prime Minister Netanyahu to stop the Prawer-Begin Plan. In addition to my own signing, I am proud of the principled and courageous stand that my Movement has taken in standing up to this injustice.

Certainly, the Israeli government has the right to determine how to best respond to the needs of the land and its citizens. Yet the current proposal is one which disenfranchises a significant population, further reduces their access to basic human necessities, and only exacerbates a problem that the government itself created through misguided and inhumane policies.

It is incredibly painful to view this situation as a Jewish resident of Israel. With the recent decision to evict Bedouin residents of Umm Al-Hiran and replace the village with a religious Jewish community, it hard to not presume that the government is simply destroying the Bedouin communities to make room for new Jewish settlement of the Negev. Israel already has one demographic crisis on its hands (see: Israeli Arabs and the Palestinians) – why would it willfully create another?

Heeding Ben-Gurion’s charge, we must ensure that the Negev is the birthing ground of Israel’s moral vigor, not an ethically desolate and suffocating environment.

6 Responses to “The Bedouin of Anatevka”

  1. Er, uh, Anatevka was a fictional place and if Bikel thinks it ever existed, well his brain is kind of old. All of my ancestors, being non-fictional characters never lived there.

    In fact most shtetls were filthy, overcrowded, poor places and I’m glad they’re gone. I would never live in one.

    If the places the bedouin live in resemble shtetls then Israel is doing right.

    I would have thought that this type of Schmaltzkopf was reserved for the Orthodox. Turns out the reform have the same problem.

    Dave Boxthorn · November 29th, 2013 at 10:51 pm
  2. [...] published for Jewschool and crossposted at The Times of [...]

    The Bedouin of Anatevka | A Juicy Blog by Jesse · November 30th, 2013 at 10:59 am
  3. Hi Dave,

    Thanks for commenting, though I think you may have missed Bikel’s and my point… he was intentionally being ironic. Nobody making that reference actually believes that Anatevka was a real place. Moreover, nobody (certainly not myself) was insinuating that the shtetl was a particularly glamorous place or that we should return to that lifestyle; rather that — as a people who are intimately familiar with being kicked out of our homes and forcibly relocated — we should draw on our history of the sthetl to learn how we can and should treat others.

    Jesse · December 1st, 2013 at 11:52 am
  4. [...] Bedouin of Anatevka (Jewschool) var dd_offset_from_content = 60;var dd_top_offset_from_content = 0;var dd_override_start_anchor_id [...]

    Links for Chanukah at Brandenburg Gate | Heeb · December 1st, 2013 at 1:09 pm
  5. Given that ‘getting kicked out of our (shtetl) homes’ was the best thing that happened to 19th c. East European Jews (especially with what came later) I doubt that moving Bedouin a few miles could be that bad.

    Dave Boxthorn · December 1st, 2013 at 4:43 pm
  6. Except that forcible eviction from one’s life-long home is a violent and emotionally harrowing event that seems utterly wrong when the people subjected to the punishment have done nothing wrong themselves.

    The Bedouin, for all their poverty and neglect, have served and died as Israeli soldiers since the state’s start. This seems a quick way to alienate them from society and exacerbate ethnic strife.

    Kung Fu Jew · December 3rd, 2013 at 7:02 pm

Leave a Reply

If your comment does not immediately appear, do not freak out and repost your message a dozen times. Please note that all new visitors must have their first comment approved by the editor, and you must provide a legitimate e-mail address and use the same username for the system to "remember" you. The editor maintains the right to refuse comments deemed inappropriate or unhelpful. Users who repeatedly delve into ad hominem attacks or other troll-like behavior will be banned.

Trackback (Right-click & 'Copy Link...') | Comments RSS

"I may attack a certain point of view which I consider false, but I will never attack a person who preaches it. I have always a high regard for the individual who is honest and moral, even when I am not in agreement with him. Such a relation is in accord with the concept of kavod habriyot, for beloved is man for he is created in the image of God." —Rav Joseph Soloveitchik