So does anybody find it strange

that the immediate reaction to the Pentagon shooting was this, according to the NYT?

The gunman who on Thursday opened fire at an entrance to the Pentagon, injuring two police officers, harbored a deep-seated anger toward federal authorities and was possibly motivated by a desire for revenge against the government he suggested had staged the Sept. 11 attacks, officials said Friday.

Nobody, however, is using the T word (even though it is the second attack against a government building in two weeks).

On the other hand, within hours of the Fort Hood shooting the word was

Cone said the motive for the attack, which took place just after 1:30 p.m. CT, is unclear. While he said he could not rule out the incident as an act of terrorism, evidence does not support that theory.

Even though “evidence does not support that theory.”

It seems to me that terrorism is defined, in our fair and balanced culture, by who the actor is, rather than by the action. Non-Muslims don’t, it seems, do terrorism.

Israel Apartheid Week

New Web “Magazines”

Ethan Bronner’s Son: a Liability For His Objectivity?

Envisioning Jewish Peoplehood Project

How is this smear campaign different from all other smear campaigns?

Dos Likht fun Kanada

“Israel, Good Job!”

el es frida kahlo: opening in St. Louis

Yesterday’s News Tomorrow

And The Award For Tackiest Fundraising Message of 2009 Goes To…

Shooting the Jewish Press

The Insider’s Guide to Hanukkah Gift-Giving

Standing Up For Justice, or Straightening Our Curly Jew Hair?

Happy do whatever you want-akkah…

The relationship between a Jewish identity and a political identity

Jewesses in Hollywood

Wish you were at J Street? Follow us and friends on Twitter!

Join Free!