Israel, Politics, Religion

Christian Support for Israel Stronger Than Ever

The NY Times reports,

Many conservative Christians say they believe that the president’s support for Israel fulfills a biblical injunction to protect the Jewish state, which some of them think will play a pivotal role in the second coming. Many on the left, in turn, fear that such theology may influence decisions the administration makes toward Israel and the Middle East.
[…] The alliance of Israel, its evangelical Christian supporters and President Bush has never been closer or more potent. In the wake of the summer war in southern Lebanon, reports that Hezbollah’s sponsor, Iran, may be pushing for nuclear weapons have galvanized conservative Christian support for Israel into a political force that will be hard to ignore.

Full story.

22 thoughts on “Christian Support for Israel Stronger Than Ever

  1. I haven’t read enough about this phenomenon to know, but do the Christians in support of Israel consider it a Jewish state? I’m just trying to understand whether they are supportive of Israel as a Jewish state or as the future home of the messiah who they expect to arrive… and presumably convert everyone. There are enough religious extremists with inflexible positions on Israel as it is, and my primary concern is that their support not mushroom into a sense of entitlement.

  2. The Evangelical movement supports Israel as a Jewish state until Jesus “returns,” at which point the Jews will either convert or be killed.

  3. There is no one “Evangelical movement”. Not all right-wing Christian supporters of Israel could be properly described as “evangelical” (and not all evangelicals are right-wing Christian supporters of Israel). It’s a complex phenomenon, with a great deal of diversity even within small sub-groups (sound familiar?).
    As best I can tell (and I’ve put some effort into trying to figure this out), the actual attitudes towards Israel among these people varies greatly, running the gamut from EV’s description above to people who have a vague notion of apocalypse in which Israel figures prominently to a more benign belief that Jews have some special significance and should be helped (just by way of example; I think there are literally dozens of differing beliefs out there, from very frightening to very admirable).

  4. In my hometown, an evangelical umbrella group organized A Night to Honor Israel, where I’m told hundreds of Christians–many of whom probably never met a Jew before–show up, join the Jewish community in opening their checkbooks for Israel-related causes, and generally try to get to know each other and the Israelis who schlep out to sell tchochkes and whatnot. It’s all very positive and genuine, even if there is a Judaism-unfriendly apocalyptic theology behind it.
    Despite my theological and political differences with many evangelicals, I welcome opportunities for two very different groups of people to find common, positive ground. I don’t think we’re going to change too many evangelical minds as to whether Jews are going to hell or not. But I rather like them supporting and affirming our Jewishness and our Jewish state now and deferring the whole convert-or-else thing to the “end times.” At the least, it’s better than getting beaten up for “killing Jesus” or being subjected to conversion scams like J4J. And in a way, it’s a refreshing sort of tolerance coming from a historically intolerant segment of society.

  5. many of the Evangelicals I speak with are not fanatical about “rapture”but they are very disturbed by the treatment of Christians in Muslim lands. When EVs make pilgrimage, they feel welcomed and well-treated in Israel. That makes an impression.

  6. while i welcome the whole common ground thing, i wonder if their vision of israel is not antithetical to mine – i.e. the america that they are trying to fashion/constitutionalize is certainly not one that i am comfortable with. this applies to everything from gay marriage, to choice, to zero tolerance policies to labor rights to prison and health care reform. whereas it is nice that they support the existence and theory behind israel, it is difficult to support a community’s stance on another country where i fundamentaly disagree with how they view the laws and rights in the one where we are both citizens together.

  7. But I rather like them supporting and affirming our Jewishness and our Jewish state now and deferring the whole convert-or-else thing to the “end times.”
    I’ve complained about this here before – I don’t understand this attitude. If someone thinks I’m going to go to hell; if his/her position is, “Well, you’re going to burn in hell for all of eternity, and you deserve to, and that doesn’t make God a bad guy, but we’re both too polite to talk about it right now.”, then I don’t care how much money they’re willing to give to Israel – I don’t want to talk to them. I know that the prevailing attitude among (politically and theologically) conservative Jews is “We’ll wait until Moshiach comes, and we’ll worry about it then.” That’s not the point. If they think I’m going to hell (and most of them have a very cavalier attitude about it – “Oh well, that’s just the way God wants it.”), I don’t want to have anything to do with them now.
    while i welcome the whole common ground thing, i wonder if their vision of israel is not antithetical to mine – i.e. the america that they are trying to fashion/constitutionalize is certainly not one that i am comfortable with. …whereas it is nice that they support the existence and theory behind israel, it is difficult to support a community’s stance on another country where i fundamentaly disagree with how they view the laws and rights in the one where we are both citizens together.
    I agree wholeheartedly.

  8. I live in deep South TX. EV’s are in our daily lives. They ONLY care about Israel as it fits their “end times” theories. The Federation /JCC in Houston continues to kiss “pastor” Haggee’s ass and put out the red carpet for him. Even when he just said a few weeks ago that all non-christians will go to hell.
    But there is a huge group pretending to be supporters of Israel…they are really Messianic “jews” trying to pick us off.
    And BTW, I don’t care if they think I am going to hell. I don’t care if they like Brussles Sprouts. The two are the same to me. who cares what they think? I don’t.

  9. I’ve complained about this here before – I don’t understand this attitude. If someone thinks I’m going to go to hell; if his/her position is, “Well, you’re going to burn in hell for all of eternity, and you deserve to, and that doesn’t make God a bad guy, but we’re both too polite to talk about it right now.”, then I don’t care how much money they’re willing to give to Israel – I don’t want to talk to them.

    I believe there’s a difference between “you’re going to burn in hell and you deserve to” vs. “you’re going to burn in hell and that’s quite unfortunate for you–oh, and if you don’t want to convert now, I’ll respect you for sticking to your people’s traditions, and you’ll have another chance when Jesus comes back.” Obviously I’d prefer that somebody believe I’m not going to burn in hell altogether, but if they must subscribe to such a theology, I’d much rather they reach out to me and support me being who I am, rather than ranting and raving about how evil and depraved I am and how I need to accept Jesus now. Politeness may be superficial sometimes, but it’s also one of the building blocks of cohesive society. If we never learned to “agree to disagree,” we’d be in a perpetual state of war.
    The ultimate challenge, of course, is where to draw the line on tolerating intolerance. The line that makes sense to me is that I can tolerate someone’s intolerant theology or ideology to the degree it doesn’t negatively affect others. I therefore am opposed to many evangelical political positions that seek to “Christianize” America (because it marginalizes non-Christians) or back up Israeli policies I view as too far right (because I think they’ll have a negative impact on Israel in the long-run). But I have much less of a problem with Christians believing I’m going to hell (assuming they keep it to themselves), because as long as I don’t believe I’m going to hell, I don’t see how their belief will ever affect me.

  10. themica,
    as long as I don’t believe I’m going to hell, I don’t see how their belief will ever affect me
    See, this is what confuses me. I don’t believe that I’m going to go to hell, but I don’t want to associate with people who do believe it. It’s the ultimate form of invalidation. I don’t understand it not bothering someone. It doesn’t make me right – I just don’t get it. Associating with them seems monstrously inappropriate to me. Also, I have abandonment issues.
    If I mean so little to them that it’s fine with them if I suffer forever, with no hope of release – then f**k them, I don’t want to have anything to do with them. Their theology is so obscene that it just puts them beyond the pale of civility.
    (BT , do you think that Israel should be taking money from them?)
    you’ll have another chance when Jesus comes back
    The thing about end-time theology, as I understand it, is that there won’t really be an opportunity for most Jews to convert. We’ll all be here after the Rapture, along with unbelieving gentiles, and most of us will die horribly during a seven year period of immense suffering – then we’ll go to hell for all of eternity. Only a few will survive long enough to see Jesus – then they get to decide whether or not to convert (presumably, everyone will). Yeah, that’s fair.
    The above represents, I believe, the “pre-millennial” scenario. The “post-millennialists” have a somewhat different one.
    The thing to remember is that there are a lot of “moderate” Christians who believe this as well – although their vision of what happens in the “last days” isn’t as clearly defined. They generally don’t bother much with the Rapture, but they still think we’re going to hell. A lot of evangelicals who don’t consider themselves to be conservative – but are not quite “progressive” a la Jim Wallis – fall into this category.

  11. I don’t understand what everyone is whining about. You want support for Israel? These christians are giving it.
    And if their relgious motivation is bothering you, that’s too bad, cause no secular person who has fully thought the issue trough would support Israel. Because logically speaking no G-d means no covenant and hence no promised land. If anybody is expecting support from ,ehm “enlightened individuals”, you’re gonna wait a long time.
    As for their apocalyptic vision of Israel’s future, has anyone of you actually read the bible? The Jewish one?

  12. formermuslim says “cause no secular person who has fully thought the issue trough would support Israel”.
    Not so. There’s a great deal of support for Israel in the US by conservatives (who may or may not be serious Christians but who don’t rely solely on religion for their policy choices), centrists and some old-style liberals. And I think they have thought through the issue. There are solid secular arguments in support of Israel. There’s a general fairness argument – that Jews ought to have a state, and that the history of the land shows that it’s inaccurate to claim that the place was “stolen” from the Palestinians. There’s a practical argument – that the US should support civilized countries against barbaric ones so as to demoralize and diminish the barbaric (or at least maintain the status quo).
    As for apocalyptic visions, I don’t recall anything in the Jewish Bible about Jews converting to Christianity or Jews going to hell. And the Rabbinic view is (generally) that the harsh end-times scenarios are only a possible future.
    I do agree with you that Jews and Israel should accept and encourage Christian support. As a small group with many and serious enemies, we don’t have a choice. However, while some of these Christians are true friends, it would be wise to be wary respecting some of the others.

  13. I would like to undermine Xian support for Israel, if and when that support means enabling Israel to maintain the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
    that means supporting selective divestment in some churches, helping the Palestinian Xians get the word out about their issues with Israel, helping the Xian Peacemaker Teams, and on and on.
    I support highlighting what is distasteful about Xian fundies in the hope that they will take it personally and stop supporting or opposing Israel and the Jews.

  14. If given the choice, I would not choose the support of right-wing evangelicals. But since the sane, humanistic people of the world have abandonned Israel, I don’t see what choice we have. Israel does not have the luxury of choosing it’s allies, particularly as the US population seems increasingly to care very little about Israel. It’s a shame (given the Evangelicals’ views on other matters), but Israel can’t afford to reject their support. The “liberals” of the world have driven Israel into these peoples’ arms.

  15. it’s interesting, because it sort of paralells what’s happened to Hamas; denied western funding, they’re compelled to turn towards Iran, which limits their ability to compromise.

  16. I’ve been told, repeatedly, that Israel needs their monetary and political support. It may be true; I don’t feel that I understand the situation well enough to hold a firm opinion. If that’s the way it is, I hate that it has to be that way.
    I’m not in a position to tell someone to ignore pragmatic necessity out of deference to my personal preferences. However, there is a tremendous difference between saying, “Yeah, they’re lunatics, and their theology is obscene, but we need them” and saying, “I don’t care what they believe. Who cares if they think I’m going to hell?” I hear the latter constantly; I almost never hear the former.

  17. cipher – Do you pray the aleinu?
    My translation from Siddur Sim Shalom reads:
    “And so we hope in you, Lord our God, soon to see Your splendor, sweeping idolatry away so that false gods will be utterly destroyed, perfecting earth by your kingship so that all mankind will invoke Your name, bringing all the earth’s wicked back to you, repentant.
    Then all who live will know that to You every knee must bend, every tongue pledge loyalty…”
    When Jews pray with Zechariah that “on that day the Lord will be One and his name One,” we are essentially hoping for something similar to these evangelicals. The reason I am not bothered by their hope that I will become part of their religion or die in the end-times is that I have an end-time vision of my own, that comes from my religion, that is completely incompatible with theirs. Who am I to say what they should believe about the end-times? What matters is that they keep the vision spiritualized and don’t attempt to actually incarnate it in the present, and with evangelical Protestants this can sometimes be a problem due to their lack of a single coherent theology and the prevalence of what is not exactly “literalism” but is a kind of reductive/fundamentalist reading of the Bible.
    That said, I don’t exactly welcome this “support” for Israel because I don’t think their politics are good. They should support an end to the occupation, a free Palestinian state, and negotiations between the two sides.

  18. “However, there is a tremendous difference between saying, “Yeah, they’re lunatics, and their theology is obscene, but we need them” and saying, “I don’t care what they believe. Who cares if they think I’m going to hell?” I hear the latter constantly; I almost never hear the former. ”
    I don’t think their theology is obscene. But I don’t beleive in it. And while the Jews all convert or die in the final act of their narrative, they are committed to protecting and strengthening Israel until that day comes. Since I don’t think that day will ever come (i.e. I, as a Jew, don’t beleive in their end-of-days scenario), why shouldn’t I accept their support in the meantime?
    The mass slaughter/conversion that will supposedly befall us will come at the hands of their alleged messiah, not at their hands. While Israel’s enemies are actively perpetuating the slaughter themselves. The choice is clear to me.

  19. As a reformist Christian, I don’t understand how anyone can really support any type of religious institution. The views I adopted would see it as a contradiction. I’m few and far between though.
    I can confirm first hand, that even ‘liberal’ Christians show support for Israel because of issues that relate to revelations, end times, or whatever you want to call it. To them, it’s irrelevant what Israeli life is like, but instead a religious obligation like tithes, an offering.
    Personally, I’m appalled when it comes to fervent religious folk who call for war and death in the name of G-d, seems such a contradiction to me. Nowadays, every religion is guilty of such sin.

  20. A lot of new stuff was posted yesterday, so this article is pretty far down the line and no one may get to see this, however…
    Sam,
    I don’t pray in synagogue; I’m not observant. In any case, I don’t see our eschatological hopes as being similar to those of the evangelicals. Using the translation you cited, the aleinu looks forward to “bringing all the earth’s wicked back to you, repentant”. That’s very far removed from torturing them for all of eternity! I agree with you about their politics, and about their “reductive/fundamentalist reading of the Bible”, but I can’t understand not being bothered by their beliefs. It represents the ultimate form of invalidation: “You are inherently deserving of eternal damnation, and you mean so little to me that the prospect doesn’t really trouble me.” It’s absolutely appalling; it’s the most appalling concept ever devised, and they’ve spent the past 2,000 years attempting to foist it upon everyone else. In being utterly willing to abandon billions of their human brothers and sisters, they create a rift in the human family, and demonstrate a mindset that is far more depraved than anything of which they can accuse those of us who are “unsaved”.
    Rootlesscosmo,
    How is their theology not obscene? They believe – many of them cavalierly – that God will torture billions of human beings forever, with no hope of release, and that this is perfectly moral; it doesn’t make God a “bad guy”. This is the very definition of obscenity!
    I’m not saying that Israel shouldn’t accept their support. As I mentioned, I don’t feel that I have the right to say that. What I am saying is that it should bother us more as a community (if we are, in fact, a community). We should view it as an unpleasant necessity, a marriage of convenience. Our attitude shouldn’t be, “So they think we’ll all burn in hell. Who cares?”
    ACE said, “How can we trust support and respect from an entity or members of such entity when we are considered disposable at some future time?”
    I agree completely. Again, it’s a marriage of convenience. Don’t turn your backs on them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.