Uncategorized

The Best Part About Being Jewish: No Matter Your Passion, Some Jews are Already Hosting a Conference On It

This is, far and away, the most Jewish-looking photograph that's ever been taken of me, including those at my Bar Mitzvah. No, I do not wear glasses.
I came to find out where Judaism went.  I keep reading about this “New Judaism,” with its Joe Liebermans and its Bibi Netanyahus and its Eric Cantors.  I keep meeting young Jews who explain to me that I just don’t understand; Israel deserves special rules for how it treats minorities, because it’s always threatened, and… and… and towelheads.  I keep hearing the American House Majority Leader, a Jew – you know, the ones who “make money like Presbyterians and vote like Puerto Ricans” – I keep hearing him talk about how we can only clean up after tornadoes if we slash the welfare budget.
And then I go back to my memory banks and there’s my rabbi, talking about the imperative to do the right thing even when it’s hard… the imperative to overcome fear and reach across the aisle and bring out the better angels of our nature.  About understanding the person who you, at first, think is demented, who you think is trying to hurt you.  We’re all fallible creatures, but we, the People of Israel, were Chosen.  God chose us to have stewardship over the Earth, not so that we could subjugate it, but so we could have true power: the power to overcome the basest human instincts.  The power to set free the captive, to clothe the naked, to give bread to the poor.  The power to change things from bad to good.
Then I turn on my computer, and there’s Bibi… oh, Bibi.  “Israel Mulls the Possibility of an Iran Strike Without US Support.”

Bibi believes he was Chosen to defend his home turf.  He doesn’t believe in the larger good of Judaism; of stewardship over the Earth and its people.  He’s thoroughly bought in to fear.  He is a nationalist; he believes in a country alone.  The fact that Jews live there is of secondary importance.
It takes a backward jump in evolution to turn the righteousness obsession of millennia of Jews – wise, educated and generally ambitious beyond their small numbers – to come up with the kind of selfish thinking that attacks a Muslim community center blocks from Ground Zero as an “act of aggression;” or that leads the world’s only superpower and strongest democracy into a war that costs it nearly all of its influence and prestige.  Both of these efforts were started by Gentiles, but people like Joe Lieberman and Stephen Schwartz carried their water and became vocal supporters of aggression and intolerance.  Clearly, Jews as a whole haven’t regressed (voting numbers of American Jews have never approached an even split), but there have been inroads.
It’s always easiest to resent people in your own group whom you think have co-opted your message (rather than outsiders who simply don’t understand the controversy), and Judaism is no different for me.  The most visible (and most visibly Jewish) Jews in American and Israeli politics have been conservatives over the past decade or so, right when I was coming of political age.  The biggest offenses, unsurprisingly, have been about Israel.  Nothing makes our ape brains go crazy like TURF.  Home, domain, territory, side… this is a concept we’re hard-wired to understand, and we’re not set up to think about it in a malleable way.  Just the idea of allowing a TURF to become something it’s not, or to allow “enemies” in, or to change what your TURF stands for… this is the stuff we apes kill our neighbors over.  Because when we were in caves foraging and hunting, turf meant survival.  And we all think our tribe deserves – needs – survival.
We all feel edgy about our turf.  The problem is, of course, that no one has a clear idea what “our” means.  Israelis and Palestinians became independent of the British Mandate at the same time.  Without rehashing the blood and terror and betrayal on both sides, even the inability to envision an endgame (let alone how to get there), the interested parties have agreed on exactly nothing since then.  What could have been a uniting theme – “Hey, the British played us off against each other – they suck!  Let’s build a great country together and show them how Semites roll!” – was, of course, never raised at all.  Instead, we were all suckers for the British “divide and rule” strategy, just like white indentured servants and black slaves in America.  We were told to hate each other, and we dutifully do so to this day.
That is Israel / Palestine’s original sin.  So what can we do?  We can embark on a shared project, together, to which we are both subordinate; we can create peace as a deliberate act.  We can cleanse the sin deliberately.
We don’t, of course.  Even for the Chosen people at their best, this level of self-awareness and ability to work together with rivals would be a challenge.  But it is a challenge worthy of our covenant with God.
“Grant us peace, Your most precious gift, O Eternal Source of peace, and give us the will to proclaim its message to all the peoples of the earth. Bless our country, that it may always be a stronghold of peace, and its advocate among the nations. May contentment reign within its border, health and happiness within its homes. Strengthen the bonds of friendship among the inhabitants of all lands, and may the love of Your name hallow every home and every heart. Blessed is the Eternal God, the Source of peace.” – Gates of Prayer
Which goes nicely with something my rabbi used as the closing line to every service:
“Remember that we must pray as if everything depends on God, but act as if everything depends on us.”
I come to J Street because I believe God wishes us to act Chosen and to seek peace actively; and at age 28, I’m lucky enough to have found a conference of Jews who believe the same.  It’s easy to have blood-spattered eyes when you’re knee-deep in conflict, which is why I believe God asks us to pick ourselves up, wash off our face, and ask how we can stop all this blood from flowing.
I couldn’t feel right being a Jew if I didn’t step back and try to find a way out.  And, as a political organizer for the past eleven years, I know better than to try to tackle anything this size myself – the very idea is laughable.  So I go to hear the opinions of people who have far more hands-on experience than I do, to report back on their ideas, and to see what I can do to help.
I can’t wait.  My conscience has been waiting since I first saw Ariel Sharon stroll around on the Dome of the Rock and deliberately set off an Intifada.  I have to reconcile my Judaism with the phony sideshow act I see being acted out in my name.  My Greyhound ticket is booked for 7AM from Montreal this Friday, and that night I’ll tell you what I find.
Thanks to Ben Murane and to Jewschool for giving me the opportunity to go and to report back on what’s happening.  Just knowing I’ll be there makes me happier with myself.  I hope I can contribute something, and that I can find a way to continue contributing long after the conference.
Lilah tov, and happy St. Paddy’s Day!
– Josh

13 thoughts on “The Best Part About Being Jewish: No Matter Your Passion, Some Jews are Already Hosting a Conference On It

  1. Bibi never believed in the Jewish way therefore he always chooses economics over Religion and in my opinion this is one of the biggest problems, the fact that The prime minister is not a religious person.

  2. You make it sound as if the Israeli’s and Arabs (not Palestinians. They shunned that name at the time) mutually declared war on each other in 1948. Maybe your reading different history books.
    In any event, I was following your general line of thought until the part where Ariel Sharon started the intifada by walking on the temple mount. An Israeli leader walks on the holiest site to Judaism (that the Jewish state handed back to the Arabs) and that is somehow a legitimate pretense for five years of suicide bombings against an entire civilian population?

  3. Chaim, that’s interesting. I’d like to hear more. I’m not EXTRAORDINARILY religious myself, but I like to think I’m faithful to my Jewishness. 🙂
    Avraham, I’m glad you were following me almost until the end. 😉 He he.
    Regarding Arabs and Jews in 1948 “mutually” declaring war on each other, I think that’s a fair assessment. We evacuated them, and the surrounding countries declared war on us. I think neither action was unexpected, and both actions created a permanent state of war that lasts until this day. I don’t know what history books you’re reading, so I can’t say if mine are different… but that is the history to which I refer. 🙂
    Regarding Ariel Sharon, I think that his championing of the Settlements, plus this paragraph from Wikipedia, are instructive:
    “On 28 September 2000, Sharon and an escort of over 1,000 Israeli police officers visited the Temple Mount complex, site of the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa Mosque, the holiest place in the world to Jews (observant Jews will not actually walk inside the enclosure but they pray at the outside wall) and the third holiest site in Islam. Sharon declared that the complex would remain under perpetual Israeli control. Palestinian commentators accused Sharon of purposely inflaming emotions with the event to provoke a violent response and obstruct success of delicate ongoing peace talks. On the following day, a large number of Palestinian demonstrators and an Israeli police contingent confronted each other at the site. According to the U.S. State Department, ‘Palestinians held large demonstrations and threw stones at police in the vicinity of the Western Wall. Police used rubber-coated metal bullets and live ammunition to disperse the demonstrators, killing 4 persons and injuring about 200.’ According to the GOI, 14 policemen were injured.”
    Sharon was running for Prime Minister at the time. This is exactly what I’m talking about. Any student of sociology or psychology would conclude that he knew exactly, precisely what he was doing by planting the Israeli flag in the ground at a shared holy site, without provocation.
    I feel we are called to be better than this. The day I saw Sharon at the Dome of the Rock / Temple Mount was one of the saddest days of my life, because everybody in the world knew what was about to happen. We don’t provoke people just because we can. To do so is to blaspheme our holy gift of peace (not to mention to insult everybody’s intelligence).
    Both of you, thank you for reading and for responding!

  4. Josh, thanks for your reply. Regarding your assessment of the events of 1948, it is well documented that the overwhelming majority of Arabs were not evacuated by any Israeli/Jewish forces but left on their own accord either because their leaders told them it would make it easier for the invading armies to clear the area, or because they Hebron in 1929. Many Jewish leaders(for example, the mayor of Haifa) actually encouraged the Arab residents to stay and become citizens in the new state. In any event, the Arab leaders at the time were quite clear that their problem was with the birth of a Jewish state, not to prevent the displacement of the Arab population.
    Regarding Sharon, I’ll agree that he was a politician who calculated his actions for what would best benefit his political career. That said, the actions of the Israeli police reflect the extremely violent nature of the protests/riots that occurred that day. I expect more of the Arab residents of Jerusalem, than to be so easily provoked to such a violent response. And I don’t see how even the violent events of that day logically lead to five years of brutal terrorism.

  5. Regarding Arabs and Jews in 1948 “mutually” declaring war on each other, I think that’s a fair assessment. We evacuated them, and the surrounding countries declared war on us. I think neither action was unexpected, and both actions created a permanent state of war that lasts until this day. I don’t know what history books you’re reading, so I can’t say if mine are different… but that is the history to which I refer.
    And this seems to be a common theme around here–which irks me for one key point:
    In November 1947 there was a deal on the table to partition the land between the River and the Sea into two distinct nation-states, one for the Jews and one for the Arabs.
    The Jews accepted that plan and the Arabs rejected it. The Jewish-Arab war then began in earnest in December 1947!
    The invasion of five neighboring armies occurred in May 1948, after the British left and the Jews declared independence.
    The one little fact, that the Jews accepted partition in November 1947 and the Arabs rejected it, throws a monkey wrench into certain historical framing.
    On the other hand, I realize that none of these points are especially germane to your overall argument, and I wish you well on your conference blogging.

  6. @Josh.
    I wasn’t going to comment on your initial Sharon comment, because I think it is not essential to your larger point.
    But, your response leads me to think you might place great importance on Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount.
    So, first, your memories are probably a bit foggy because it was one of the saddest days of your life, but Sharon stood outside of the al-Asqa Mosque when he went up to the Temple Mount, and not the Dome of the Rock (this had all been coordinated with the PA beforehand.)
    I’m not sure if Wikipedia’s opinions are the most authoritative interpretation of history, but here is a Marwan Barghouti quote from the very same Wikipedia entry:
    “I knew that the end of September was the last period (of time) before the explosion, but when Sharon reached the al-Aqsa Mosque, this was the most appropriate moment for the outbreak of the intifada….The night prior to Sharon’s visit, I participated in a panel on a local television station and I seized the opportunity to call on the public to go to the al-Aqsa Mosque in the morning, for it was not possible that Sharon would reach al-Haram al-Sharif just so, and walk away peacefully. I finished and went to al-Aqsa in the morning….We tried to create clashes without success because of the differences of opinion that emerged with others in the al-Aqsa compound at the time….After Sharon left, I remained for two hours in the presence of other people, we discussed the manner of response and how it was possible to react in all the cities (bilad) and not just in Jerusalem. We contacted all (the Palestinian) factions.”
    http://www.jcpa.org/art/brief1-16.htm
    (JCPA is obviously a political think tank, but their translations are not challenged–this quote came from an Arabic newspaper interview.)
    And, here is an excerpt from a speech by a PA official on the matter:www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-SY8JxyUQA
    (It’s put out by Palestinian Media Watch, which is obviously not an objective news agency, but their translations are never questioned.)

  7. Sharon was running for Prime Minister at the time. This is exactly what I’m talking about. Any student of sociology or psychology would conclude that he knew exactly, precisely what he was doing by planting the Israeli flag in the ground at a shared holy site, without provocation.
    No provocation?
    From the July 2000 Camp David talks.
    “Yossi Ginnosar, who pleaded for more flexibility, was told by Arafat that Jews had no right to the Temple Mount because the ‘real’ Temple was in Nablus. Without mentioning the alternative location, Erekat expressed his own doubts about the ‘imagined Temple’ during a dinner conversation. On one occasion, an angry President Clinton hotly protested that the Holy Basin was also important to Jews and Christians.”
    Doomed to Failure?
    The Politics and Intelligence of the Oslo Peace Process, by Ophira Seliktar, pp. 156-157

  8. I appreciate your guys’ feedback.
    As it happens, this all fits very comfortably within the parameters of the original argument. One of the problems with this conflict – perhaps the most entrenched obstacle to mutual understanding – is that each side can always find provocations on the part of the other, to reference as justification for their respective vengeances and other responses.
    We are intrinsically tribal, so indeed, we actively SEEK such justifications. Clearly, neither Jews nor Arabs are intrinsically evil; therefore, we must accept at some point that, as our very own Albert Einstein said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing twice and expecting a different result.” We must learn sooner, rather than later, that the paradigm itself is at fault, that Jews and Arabs under the current system both have incentives to fight, and that, as agents of peace and righteousness, it is our job to pull both sides back from the brink.
    I hold Israel to a higher standard here, or rather to a leadership role; because not only is Israel supposed to represent me and my interests, but any sane observer can see that Israel is endowed with far greater resources and the ability to restructure the conflict, whereas the PA has about as much power over it’s region as the Detroit City Council has over Metro Detroit (and I’ve lived in Metro Detroit).
    I don’t think god calls us to point fingers and delay. Peace is an urgent commandment and a key facet of who we are. All of this “but they started it!” talk doesn’t really help anything.

  9. Hi Josh. My points were not about playing the blame game, but rather ensuring that we are at least looking at the same facts. It seemed to me that some of the facts you used in your post were incorrect and favored a narrative of blaming Israel or equating Israel’s contribution to the lack of peace. If that is your position, that’s fine as long as its based on accurate information.
    On a side note, this is obviously a very heated issue, and I appreciate the civil tone of all your posts. I hope I am coming across the same way.

  10. We must learn sooner, rather than later, that the paradigm itself is at fault, that Jews and Arabs under the current system both have incentives to fight, and that, as agents of peace and righteousness, it is our job to pull both sides back from the brink.
    I have no problem with this view, but to be fair you’ve tried to entrap us, by starting with the “finger pointing”

  11. Avraham, thank you as well! It has been a very enlightening and thought-provoking exchange, and I think we pretty clearly outlined the parameters of the debate together. I look forward to speaking with you in the future! (For the record, I’m not sure we started with different facts; maybe different assumptions about peoples’ motivations.) 🙂
    Jonathan, I’m glad we see eye on the basic premise. I respectfully disagree – I wouldn’t call my dismay at our failure to lead effectively “finger-pointing.” But I understand that, like all issues related to tribe, people tend to see things from an AvB perspective, and that’s only human. 🙂 But that, to me, is why it’s so important to change the rules of the game.

  12. @Josh,
    God bless you, but above you’re the one presenting things from one perspective, vis-a-vis the Second Intifada’s roots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  13. Israelies are sefish nationalists? And you are not the mad syndromed,selfish mainstreamed cowards.You betray not only Israelies but humans in yourselves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.