Global, Israel, Mishegas, Politics

A Surprising Turn of Events–Goldwasser and Regev May NOT be Coming Home

In a very surprising change in the position of the Israeli government, Ha’aretz reports that the IDF may soon declare Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev “killed in action.” The two soldiers were kidnapped by Hezbollah in June of 2006, which triggered the summer war two years ago.
In recent reports, the government was said to be in negotiations with Hezbollah via German mediators on an exchange of Samir Kuntar, a convicted murderer held by Israel since 1979, for the two captive soldiers. The government announced that were the two soldiers declared “killed in action,” there would certainly be no deal exchanging Kuntar for their bodies.
While last week there were reports of an imminent deal to be carried out between June 20-25, beginning yesterday the Israeli media reported that the deal was in danger of collapsing after Hezbollah added Palestinian prisoners being released as part of the negotiated deal. Now, it seems that Israel is possibly going to declare the soldiers dead, thereby ending any negotiations regarding Samir Kuntar. It seems likely that Israel would continue to negotiate to retrieve the remains of the soldiers, as has been the historic practice of the Israeli government.
The announcement comes as a shock to the families of the captive soldiers, who were under the impression their sons would be home this week. According to Miki Goldwasser, mother of Ehud,

“I ask what happened now that they remembered two years after the abduction to make such a move…Why now? Why when the deal is closed and it is the best possible deal?”

The reported deal to exchange Samir Kuntar for the Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev was overwhelmingly supported in the Knesset and specifically, the cabinet. The deal also received support from the Israeli public, and most importantly, was supported by the families of the captive soldiers.
Ehud’s wife, Karnit, said:

“We are at the end of a very difficult day in the Knesset, on the verge of humiliating…At the end of the day I get a call that the file has been transferred to the chief military rabbi. I don’t have time to notify the family before I hear it on the news. I am furious. This is a terrible and shameful day for the state of Israel,”

According to the report, she added that the family has been reduced to begging the ministers to agree to a prisoner swap.
It seems that the Olmert administration picked up on the demand to release Palestinian soldiers as an excuse to get out of the deal. It seems that they had come so far in the negotiation to release Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev. It seemed like it had been successful and the soldiers would be freed. And now they’re dead?
What goes through the mind of Prime Minister who has almost no support from his people, who denies the will of his electorate, who denies the will of his cabinet, who denies the will of his parliament, who denies the will of the families who urge him to free Samir Kuntar to free their sons?
How is it that this man is even still in office? Is this a sign that Israeli democracy has matured to the point that bi-annual elections are a thing of the past? Or, perhaps, this is a sign that Israeli apathy has hit an all-time high, and a nation that once held the threat of toppling governments in a day now bears the corruption and dysfunction.
According to the report linked above, the deal received widespread support from the government and the public, only the PMO and the defense establishment do not support the deal. Is this an example of when the army and government “know more than the people”? Or is this another example of how the IDF and the PMO are completely out of touch with the perspectives and will of the Israeli public.
I, for one, am a bit dismayed and a lot surprised.

9 thoughts on “A Surprising Turn of Events–Goldwasser and Regev May NOT be Coming Home

  1. Maybe because as negotiations progressed it became apparent that Goldwasser and Regev are dead. At that point it no longer made sense to trade a high value terrorist for just their remains.

  2. Avi, it seems that information, if it is so, was not passed on to the parents of Goldwasser. Wouldn’t they be amongst the first to know?

  3. Avi–
    You seem correct. But perhaps the theory goes that, by releasing every Hizbollah/Lebanese prisoner, we might reduce Hizbullah’s justification for kidnapping soldiers, and some of their legitimacy as an armed organization?

  4. Justin–
    I hear what you’re saying, but I’d be a bit wary of making statements like ” IDF and the PMO are completely out of touch with the perspectives and will of the Israeli public.”
    I’d venture to guess that it least some members of the IDF’s upper echelon are as in touch with the Israeli public, as least as much as are you and me.

  5. Jonathan,
    Though of course it’s a compelling argument to say that, if Israel did not hold any Lebanese prisoners, Hezbollah would not kidnap Israelis, there is evidence that this is simply not the case. For example, if this report is correct, not even Samir Kuntar and the bodies of Lebanese captured during the war was enough for Hezbollah – they want Palestinian prisoners as well. So, one can assume, even without any Lebanese in Israeli jails, as long as there are Palestinian prisoners they would continue to kidnap Israelis.
    Second, you’re assuming that Hezbollah is an organization that sets a legitimate goal for itself, and then does whatever it can (including terrorist measures) to achieve those goals. But that once those goals would be achieved, they would stop.
    Consider these words from a 2002 article by Jeffrey Goldberg, then of the New Yorker – http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/10/14/021014fa_fact4?currentPage=4
    Noting that after Israel left southern Lebanon in 2000, Hezbollah simply chose another justification for their attacks – Shebaa Farms – read this from a Hezbollah official:
    Ezzeddin seemed to concede that the Hezbollah campaign to rid Shebaa of Israeli troops is a pretext for something larger. “If they go from Shebaa, we will not stop fighting them,” he told me. “Our goal is to liberate the 1948 borders of Palestine,” he added, referring to the year of Israel’s founding. The Jews who survive this war of liberation, Ezzeddin said, “can go back to Germany, or wherever they came from.”

  6. I think what happened is that the Ron Arad Lobby ™ worked overtime to ensure that Quntar would not be released for these two infantrymen, enlisted men, so that additional informaiton about Arad could maybe one day somehow be found.
    Arad may or may not be returnable, dead or alive, but these two are (dead or alive, again). So take your pick.

  7. first of all, basic negotiation tactics:
    the other side puts in a lst minute demand, hoping that the media and families will force the government to give in to it (which is whats happening) – our side has to do something to equal the lots, not support their demands.
    second,
    if there really is new information, it should be considered. f such information exists the families probably got a general warning as to it’s content, but woldnt neccicerily have been allowed to actualy see it and probably not be informed of the source (for the saftey of the source).
    third,
    personally, i believe it’s obvious by the way the negotiations are going that they are dead. hizbulla would never have accepted this kind of deal had even one of them been alive.
    fourth,
    if they are dead, trading live terrorists for them isnt somthing that should be done lightly.
    shachar

  8. Jason,
    I’m just bringing up that idea. You don’t need to convince me that trading alive prisoners for dead ones is a mistake, especially because it takes away any motivation for our enemies not to kill our captured soldiers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.