Israeli schools not too good

While the woes of the Israeli school system (or should I say, “systems” given the differing economic and content systems for the different faith, sect and ethnic groups) are not exactly news, one might not have thought things were quite this bad:
From JTA breaking news:
Israeli schools fail
The Israeli school system ranks among the worst in the developed world in several categories, a new study found.
“Education at a Glance 2006,” published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, found that Israeli teachers earn the fourth-lowest salaries, Israeli classrooms are among the most crowded and the average number of years Israeli schoolchildren go to school is among the lowest of the 32 OECD member and partner states surveyed between 1995 and 2004.

2 thoughts on “Israeli schools not too good

  1. That Israeli schools are not as good as they should be is, alas, not news. But here is some relevant news:
    Israel Public health nurses’ struggle against transfer of school health services to manpower company – more a struggle against sweeping privatization of health services than a battle over employment conditions.
    Privatization today, illness tomorrow
    By Avirama Golan / Ha’aretz / September 13, 2006
    The public health nurses’ struggle against the transfer of school health services to a manpower company can of course be described – as Finance Ministry officials are doing – as a battle over employment conditions. Not that that’s so terrible: After all, there seems to be some logic in a person’s desire to preserve job security. But in the case of the nurses, who in recent years began working under a private association and are not civil servants in any case – that is not the main thing. At the heart of the attempt to minimize the blow to these services lies a much more important struggle – against the sweeping privatization of the health services.
    The case of the schools exposes privatization’s failure in preventive medicine in particular, and in the health services in general. Preventive medicine is the mainstay of a developed society. It is not by chance that the OECD countries decided preventive medicine is a condition for growth, and defined it as a threshold requirement for joining the organization. A World Bank paper states, “In places in the world where preventive medicine services have been transferred to competitive bodies, there has been a decline in immunization coverage and an increase in the extent of illnesses requiring immunization.”
    Nobody in the treasury can claim not to know these things. What is also known is the simple calculation that shows, in black and white, that when hearing or vision problems, eating disorders, depression – or even abuse – of children are not diagnosed in time, these children soon become a heavy burden on the education, health and welfare systems. Even if they drop out of – or are dropped by – all the systems and fall ill or disabled, or turn to crime, they will cost society and the government much more than a nurse’s salary or pension.
    But for years the treasury has been waging a stubborn and systemic war of attrition against the health services, a war whose most blatant symptom is the blow to preventive medicine. Every few months a focus of privatization erupts into public awareness. There was the transfer of the well-baby clinics to the health services organizations, thus eliminating – for reasons of economic feasibility – preventive treatment for remote, weak populations: small peripheral communities, the Bedouin, foreign workers without residence permits, et al. There was the plan to privatize the hospitals for the mentally ill, and now there are the school health services.
    In all these cases, the direct victims are those who cannot afford the increasingly expensive health services, and worse, anyone who is unable – due to economic or geographic reasons, or simply due to a lack of awareness – to arrange diagnostic tests for himself and his children. Israel is justifiably proud of its hospital system, which in spite of overcrowding and budgetary problems entitles everyone to emergency treatments and complex operations. But these treatments are the last (and most expensive) stage, and should be rendered superfluous by preventive medicine, including diagnoses, inoculations and counseling.
    Economically speaking, this is a big mistake. A comparison between Israel, where the health care privatization process is still moving slowly, and the United States, which has fulfilled the dream – reveals the infant mortality rate there is higher than here, and life expectancy is lower, despite the fact that the U.S. government spends far more on health care per person than the Israeli government. In every other respect – social, humanitarian, civil-democratic – this is a matter of dangerous neglect.
    The percentage of children per capita in Israel is the highest in the western world. (38 percent of the population is 18 and under). Since 1997 the number of students in Israel has grown by 33 percent, whereas the budget for school health services (which in 1997 was transferred from the Education Ministry to the Health Ministry, by dint of a government health law) has declined steadily. Public health nurses visit not only the state schools but also churches and mosques where children study. The treasury, which is pleased about erasing expenditure items, may not be interested in who replaces them. They should know: In every Arab community where the state avoids its civic duties, it is replaced by charities of the Islamic Movement, which distances its members from the state and leads them to political radicalism.
    The Arab periphery is only the most extreme example of the folly. A society where only the children of the rich receive inoculations and diagnostic tests, whose public health nurses – once the clear symbol of the system’s responsible, professional and human touch – speedily leaf through the files of thousands of children at record pace, while being tyrannized and exploited by manpower companies (see: security and caregiving firms) – is a society conducting its expenditure accounts blindly and obtusely, because it has apparently given up on tomorrow.

  2. I don’t know enough about the merits of the Israeli school system to take a position on the issue, but this-
    “Israeli teachers earn the fourth-lowest salaries, Israeli classrooms are among the most crowded and the average number of years Israeli schoolchildren go to school is among the lowest of the 32 OECD member and partner states surveyed between 1995 and 2004”
    – doesn’t really measure the quality of the schools. When the kids graduate, are they literate? Ready for college? The military? Employable? What do they know? Can they think? Are they acculturated as befits citizens of a Jewish state (we’ll leave aside for now exactly what that entails)? Do they have adequate political knowledge? Jewish knowledge? Historic, scientific, technical knowledge? Are they prepared to become part of an electorate facing constant difficult decisions? Are they competitive globally? How well does their education serve them intellectually, morally, economically and militarily? These are the questions I’d like to see answered. All things being equal, I have no problems with more years of schooling and smaller classrooms, and I even think SOME teachers should be paid more, but these items don’t measure what counts, which is the end result.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.