Regarding, “being Jewish was something to be apologetic about,” I am suprised HT could admit she was so misguided. I remember standing up against anti-Jewish slurs as a kid, yet HT thinks I am the misguided one. Strange.

and operative word is WAS misguided

“I remember, before I was religious, when being Jewish was something to be apologetic about, that if a band I liked had someone Jewish in it, I got all happy.”
So before being ‘religous’ HT was ashamed. The fact that HT is damaged goods really explains a lot. Like, for instance, why HT took pleasure in Yisrael’s intermarrying (as HT believed at the time). I think a healthy orthodox-minded person would have been upset (or simply uninterested) by this knowledge. Taking pleasure in someone else’s misfortune is a sign of real personal weakness. Love, the Jewish Nigger.

Although, I still maintain that HT is a figment spawned by a far leftist’s idea of what a right wing nut should behave like. If not, its amazing how similar the right and left become when represented by the stupid and/or deranged. This ‘sand nigger’ thinks ya’ll run a racist site. I felt more welcome at LGF.

great – let the Germans make all the money.
not impressive – shameful.

“Taking pleasure in someone else’s misfortune is a sign of real personal weakness.”
Actually we all do it. But to gloat about it, that’s the root of HT’s issues. Which are too many to mention in the space of a comment box.
“there’s a difference between a black person and a nigger. That’s 1.”
How very Chris Rock kike (I mean, hell, if we can throw around sand nigger, nigger, why not be inclusive, right kike?)

“Shtreimel, offensive, but well put.”
Yeah, I might get banned for that shit. But f’it. I thought I prefered HT’s psychotic Jewish passion to Brown’s cool, removed conspiracy theories. But, and I can’t believe I’m going to type this, I miss Brown. At least he’s got respect and he tries to do his homework.

yeh, that kind of sucks about the German thing, I’m with ya there. But with the tools they have, in the world they know, it’s still a big opportunity.

“but since you’re doing it halfass and just living a lie,
you’re a joke”
Chris Rock:
“Shit, there’s always a reason to slap somebody, you just don’t do it?”
Why Chris, why?

HT, are you saying that in your view, a goy cannot perform additional mitzvot beyond the Noachide 7? By the way, I am not halfway. I would never permit myself to be counted as a Jew, for minyan or any other halachic purpose, by the Orthodox.

HT,
Yeah, you got under my skin. No doubt about it. And it would seem I’m not the only one. I loved Jewschool. Told many of my friends/family to visit. Since you’re last few posts/comments, it’s gong the way of Ogrish and Stormfront combined. Mazel Tov.
Hello Jewlicious.
C’mon J, get that blog up already.

I;m saying, don’t disrespect G-d, not me, G-d, by calling yourself a Jew.

“there’s a difference between a black person and a nigger. That’s 1.”
Then you are a nigger I suppose. And I am a black person? Maybe, like Sam, you don’t believe in the social construction “race”? I don’t really get it. Is there some sort of deconstructionist argument going over my head?
2. dude, your analysis is way off bent.
(homage to Mobius:) Umm, er, no dude, you, like, err, suck more.
“3. Conservative conversions don’t count.”
You defamed (rather than debated) Yisrael before you knew any details of the conversion…or if there was a conversion in the first place.
“4. Those who cannot debate, defame.”
Are you a drug addict? Seriously.
If HT is a joke, a caricature, then the perpetrator of the joke is a kike (as not all Jews are kikes, of course). If HT is real, then you have my sympathy.

I’m a merry kike.
Can I ask you something?
if someone calls you a nigger, does it make you a nigger?

“I don’t make the habit of calling black people niggers – it was just to rile you easily offended people up.”
May I suggest experimenting in Harlem you piece of excrement.
(I usually don’t compare human beings to shit, but…)

HT, you should restrain yourself rather than damage the work your brother has done here. He whould not have to be your enforcer (and he suprisingly hasn’t yet) why don’t you police yourself?

I don’t know you or what you are, I didn’t call you a nigger. I said the word sand nigger.
And even if I do call you a nigger, I don’t see why the fuck you would care.

Mobius, your joke has become particularly revealing.

haha if I really wanted to be nasty, it would be a good time to say, well, I’m not the right color for it, but I don’t mean it.
it would just be the opportunity for a prime diss.
I’m not gonna call you a nigger, especially because you said you’re a Jew. And if you’re not, like I said, if a black person is good and has respect for themselves and doesn’t hate Jewish people, I have nothing but respect.
But as for your beliefs, you’re disgusting.
And in any case, Yisrael had given me enough information to know that he had no right telling me how to be a Jew. The end.

wow you called me damaged goods. I’m suffering. Owtch. OOtch.
nigga please.
heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

My God. Even if HT is a figment of Dan’s imagination, this has gone on too far, too long and it’s too disturbing.
My last comment to HT will be this…I’ve heard Jews like you exist…I’ve read stories about ’em…and I didn’t believe them (because I never met one, until now).
You’ve got some chest bangin’ to do my dear. And I wouldn’t wait to the Fall.
Ciao.

this is awesome.

What happened to this blog???

People around here need not to care so much about what other people say or think. It shows a lack of self-pride if words of one yo-yo will make you change your mind about yourself.
I think, if anything, HT is showing a lesson many of you need to learn: if you’re so sure about yourself and what you believe in, the words of your detractors are meaningless.

I agree with a number of the posters above. Independent of the actual identity of Ms. Terror, she is the source of the worst hillul HaShem I have ever seen on this blog. As a somewhat liberal person, I am offended by Terror’s comments. As an orthodox Jew, though, I am simply ashamed. Just this past week, we read: “You shall not lift up the name of the Lord, your God, in vain, for the Lord will not hold blameless anyone who takes His name in vain.” I hope that all those who remain on this site will see Holy Terror’s comments as reflections of a confused individual and not of HaShem and his Torah. I have seen mentally unstable people, dressed as Jesus, drenched in fake blood, yelling biblical injunctions from the hoods of cars. Holy Terror’s ramblings and baitings reflect true Judaism no more than these Jesuses (Jesi?) reflect the teachings of mainstream Christianity. LaShem Shamayim, Holy Terror, please quietly mutter to yourself instead of dragging HaShem’s name through the mud publicly.

I didn’t know what you thought is what Shamayim thinks…. and the true teachings of Christianity are that Jews are vipers…if you’ve ever read their NT…
btw Dickforce, you know that the Arab word for a black person is synonymous with slave?
hahahahahhah go stick up for them

Mobius – could we have the option of a non-HT version of the blog? I feel like I just started enjoying this site when things started taking a tedious and shrill tone.

I enjoy the traditional fascist method of argumentation by anecdote and vague reference, but could do without all the hatred and racial slurs.
And I agree, it’s becoming less and less worthwhile to post on this blog with HT around spitting worthless bile all over the place.

Terror, you seem to understand neither the concept of chillul HaShem nor, surprisingly, the basic fashion in which we Jews relate to our holy texts. Time and time again, Jews are accused of something because, well, its in our Torah. And time and time again, I have to explain that our halakha l’maaseh comes not from the direct word as written in the Torah but from the oral law, the understanding of our Rabbis. Yet, you very naively take a quote from the Christian scriptures out of context and assume that that is what Christians think? Curious. As for desecration of HaShem’s name. I admit, there is a lot of junk thrown around in this comment section. But, when it is from a liberal or secular writer, guess what? It doesn’t at all reflect poorly on Judaism, Jews, the Torah, or HaShem. When someone who claims to be religious and even has the audacity to add “Holy” to their posting name throws around ethnic slurs, baits people, insults people, and generally acts in a horrendously rude and inappropriate way, that is chillul HaShem. And that is what you are doing.
I am reminded of an article in which a religious Jew described a conversation with a secular Jew. The secular Jew commented on the arrest of orthodox Jews in Israel for counterfeiting money. The woman replied: “Wait a minute. If they were counterfeiting money, then by definition, they were not orthodox.” You Holy Terror, real or counterfeit right-winger, are not an orthodox Jew. A hope everyone here can recognize that.

Man, you’re pretty holy yourself.
Holes in the head…what, you think that Christians don’t believe their own scriptures??!?!
Take a gander…
Matthew’s Jesus declares: “Beware of the false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorns, nor figs from thistles, are they? Thus, every good tree bears good fruit, but the rotten tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:15-20; see also Luke 6:43-45).
In these verses, Jesus vigorously affirms his opinion that what is good cannot possibly produce evil, and conversely, that what is evil cannot possibly produce good: “A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit.” Viewed from this New Testament all or nothing perspective, Christianity cannot be considered good since so many wrongs have issued from it since its inception.
To argue, as many Christian apologists do, that the evils resulting to the world in the wake of Christianity are not really of Christian origin is tantamount to claiming that the bad fruit growing on a tree were not produced by the tree. No amount of explaining can absolve Christianity from the innumerable wrongs stemming from the hegemony it has exercised over vast areas and peoples in the course of it tortuous history.
Matthew also records Jesus as saying: “Not everyone who says to me: ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of the heavens, but he who does the will of my Father who is in the heavens. Many will say to me on that day: ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons, and in your name perform powerful works?’ And then I will declare to them: ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you who practice lawlessness'” (Matthew 7:21-23).
Jesus’ above statements do not equivocate. It’s all or nothing. How does this apply to Christianity, which has spoken in the name of Jesus and in his name “performed powerful works?” Could Jesus possibly accept any group or individual that claims to be Christian? To be true to his own dictum that bad fruit can never be produced by a good tree, Jesus would disown and reject Christianity for all the evil it has perpetrated in his name. No Christian group or individual is exempt for all are the fruit of a bad tree. That is because many of the horrors Christians have subjected the world to are the direct result of Jesus’ teachings as found in the Gospels.

Matthew’s Jesus declares: “Beware of the false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorns, nor figs from thistles, are they? Thus, every good tree bears good fruit, but the rotten tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:15-20; see also Luke 6:43-45).
In these verses, Jesus vigorously affirms his opinion that what is good cannot possibly produce evil, and conversely, that what is evil cannot possibly produce good: “A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit.” Viewed from this New Testament all or nothing perspective, Christianity cannot be considered good since so many wrongs have issued from it since its inception.
To argue, as many Christian apologists do, that the evils resulting to the world in the wake of Christianity are not really of Christian origin is tantamount to claiming that the bad fruit growing on a tree were not produced by the tree. No amount of explaining can absolve Christianity from the innumerable wrongs stemming from the hegemony it has exercised over vast areas and peoples in the course of it tortuous history.
Matthew also records Jesus as saying: “Not everyone who says to me: ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of the heavens, but he who does the will of my Father who is in the heavens. Many will say to me on that day: ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons, and in your name perform powerful works?’ And then I will declare to them: ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you who practice lawlessness'” (Matthew 7:21-23).
Jesus’ above statements do not equivocate. It’s all or nothing. How does this apply to Christianity, which has spoken in the name of Jesus and in his name “performed powerful works?” Could Jesus possibly accept any group or individual that claims to be Christian? To be true to his own dictum that bad fruit can never be produced by a good tree, Jesus would disown and reject Christianity for all the evil it has perpetrated in his name. No Christian group or individual is exempt for all are the fruit of a bad tree. That is because many of the horrors Christians have subjected the world to are the direct result of Jesus’ teachings as found in the Gospels.

you guys are getting so mad at this girl and then blaming her that she’s being evil
anybody who feels guilty gets mad
its about time you get mad
to explain it simply
she upsets you becasue you feel guilty and you know the ultimate truth

oh wow, that’s great, that’s real smart. amazing debate

HT, considering you deleted my comment and the whole post, I’m posting it again. First, a message to Mobius: I’m not from the East Coast, and I’m not from Israel- I’m from Berkeley, CA, and you used to have a wonderful, thought provoking site. I may think your left-wing antics are distrubing, but I respect what you say, and will gladly, respectfully debate them.. I encouraged all my friends at Hillel and our Israel Action Committee to read this site. Now, until HT leaves, I’m going to actively encourage them NOT to read it. Enough is enough, this is just pure hate.
And my orginal message to HT: ” I am Orthodox, as if that somehow makes me ‘better’ to make this point: I have never seen such a sick, caricaturish picture of an ultra-Orthodox Jew as you. I have tried not to judge, and I’m sure you’re going to go after me for this, but I’ve been following all that you’ve been writing, and I’ll tell you this: to some large extent, you are a terrible person. Maybe a good Jew, an observant Jew, machmir on everything you should be, but you have clearly lost sight of some larger Torah laws as Ve’ahavta L’rei’echa Kamocha- and ‘they started it’ or ‘they are haters’ simply doesn’t cut it. It is people like you that make most Jews wonder how ultra-Orthodox Jews can look in the mirror and not break down at the sight. Please stop writing, or, if you continue, stop making vicious ad hominem attacks. I cringe at the damage the vast majority of your later posts have made. Please think about what you’re doing. As an observant Jew, you should really be better than this.”

man, if you’re religious I’m the count of monte cristo
SANCTUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARYYYY

unless I’m mistaken, Mobius trashed the anti-gay thread

Conservatice conversions are quite often done completely according to halacha- it’s worth looking into on a case by case basis, but don’t knock them right of the bat, as many are done exactly like ortho ones.
btw, a non-Jewish person who knows the halacha but doesn’t plan on following it is 1. technically allowed to convert 2. still jewish after the fact. The reason most batei din refuse to convert them, is that they don’t want the responsibility of making a person obligated in laws they def won’t keep
Soooo many reasons why ppl should actually learn halacha– it’s utterly amazing what you dig up