Uncategorized

The Human Tragedy


If you can view these pictures without shedding so much as a tear, you’re simply inhumane. For it or against it, you must feel it. And if you are for it, then just know and feel this pain and never forget what it has been caused for. You must remain eternally vigilant in making sure that this does not go down in history as a grand mistake. If this is a step towards justice, make sure that justice is truly attained. Do not let this end up a mere appeasment of killers. The onus is on you.
[Update] A West Bank woman has self-immolated in protest of the disengagement.

53 thoughts on “The Human Tragedy

  1. nah, it’s not humaneness that lets one be manipulated by emotions. the humane approach is to apply some thoughtfulness to viewing the pain. if i believe that following general sharon’s strategy is obligatory (and might even have merit), then i can smile sadly at those suffering now – just as i can smile sadly when my child is hurting while reluctantly following my parental guidance.

  2. i’m sorry but i don’t think you can equate the uprooting of 1,500 families from lives in which they’ve invested themselves for three decades with a child’s naiivity.

  3. Hey Mo, they [the settlers] had no right to be there. It was not part of the UN-mandate of ’48 which clearly defined those areas as Arab land.
    It is sad to see. And it pisses me off that the kids have to suffer their parents misguided zealotry. Not fair.

  4. the arabs rejected the partition plan and did not ratify it; technically that’s a forfeit of entitlement.

  5. C’mon comrades, lets be silent.
    As the post stated, it doesn’t matter wether you’re for or against the disengagement – either way there are Jews here who are suffering, and we must be in solidarity with their pain.
    From a pro-disengagement position, their pain is part of the sacrifice that we are making for peace. “Land for peace” : this means ‘we will trade something that is valuable to us – Holy Land where Jewish communities live – in exchange for something that is more valuable to us – peace’.
    If their pain is not our pain, and we don’t care for the loss that is those communities, then a proper trade is not being conducted (and we will have to trade something else for peace)
    SHALOM
    amen amen amen

  6. ba. I shed no tear for these people. the tens of thousands of palestinians who’ve lost their houses for only a few thousand settlers, the palestinians living in a fragmented military ghetto with no rights – they deserve the settler’s tears (only constituting 0.6 percent of the population while living on 20 percent of the land)
    they are sitting on foreign territory. all the IDF had to do is give an ultimatum to the settlers and then redraw its forces. whoever wanted to stay there – its their own problem and responsibility. thats one good thing de gaulle did in 1962.
    the settlers are acting as if they didnt know for years this is going to happen. it was only a matter of time. instead they continued to build subsidized villas (many times built by palestinians actually), expand their Hamamot in order to annex more land to the settlements, and now we must all shed a tear because you said so? hell no.

  7. after asaf’s post, i’m damn near giving up hope that an internet community can achieve peace. can’t we just have a moment of silence? (i hear you ezra.) anytime people are crying or suffering, for whatever reason, we need to feel it. period. case closed.
    i can’t even imagine *not* feeling horrible for everyone somehow involved in this situation…

  8. “The arabs rejected the partition plan and did not ratify it; technically that’s a forfeit of entitlement.” – Mobius
    You can use that argument to justify the pre-67 borders (differing as they do from the original 48 mandate). However, nothing can justify letting Israeli civilians settle in a military-administered (i.e. non-annexed) area, with a large foreign (i.e. non-Israeli) population.
    I do have sympathy for the people who are being uprooted from their homes. However, this isn’t appeasement: it’s just morally the right thing to do.

  9. Asaf, do you have any proof that any of the communities in Gaza, or for that matter in Judea and Samaria were built on a land that was previously populated by the Arabs? I bet you could not come up with a single proof, because all of the “settlements” were built on empty land. I know you are gloating at what’s happening to our people in Gaza, just as one day I’ll be gloating when this happens to the arab enemy that has infested the land of Israel. If the so called “ethnic cleansing” can be perpetrated against the Jews, it surely can and should be perpetrated against the Arabs.

  10. Sheikh,
    i never called for the forced evacuation of people from gaza strip. all i am calling is for the redrawing the IDF. if the settlers want to stay- ZABA”SH. And I am not gloating. Your hypocracy is revealed as you admit that you will be gloating if ethnic cleansing ever happens to the palestinians. you are as hypocritical as those settlers themselves, and i shed no tear for hypocrites who take no responsibility for their actions.
    all in all, when it comes to emotions there is no right and wrong. thats why i dont like mobius demand that i “must feel” something.

  11. Frankly,
    the sympathy should not be directed entirely on the settlers. The entire Jewish nation is affected by this expulsion, no matter how much you want to distance yourself with ‘I told you’ or ‘they had no right to be there’ self-righteousness.
    The world and the Arabs see a specific message: Jewish stormtroopers (who the hell chose to give the police black uniforms(!) which are so uncharacteristic of Israel?!) removing Jews from their homes, Jews succumbing to terrorism, and Israel admitting that all territory is up for graps (Kfar Darom was founded long before the state of Israel) even land that was purchased by Jews legally under international law. (an ignored fact is that some of the land is not ‘state/crown lands’ but rather privately owned in all sense of the term).
    Another interesting thing is that there was a definite change in reporting of the Israeli reporters (most of whom had never been to Gush Katif before and never mingled with the residents (or too many other religious Jews for that matter)) before Sunday and especially today and between those people/commentators sitting in the the air-conditioned studios in Tel Aviv/Jerusalem/Herzilia h. I sensed a strong sense of ‘what have we done’ in a few reporters broadcasts while those in the studio continued with their disdain. On one occaision, a studio yuppie made an off-hand comment about settlers, and the reporter clearly defended them against this attack.

  12. Ben-yamin
    “Hey Mo, they [the settlers] had no right to be there. It was not part of the UN-mandate of ’48 which clearly defined those areas as Arab land.
    It is sad to see. And it pisses me off that the kids have to suffer their parents misguided zealotry. Not fair.” you are so so so si right.
    I feel sorry for the kids from bothsides……

  13. BTW,
    I’ve hung up Mobius’ blue/orange icon with orange and blue ribbons at work on the bulletin board and on my settler doorpost.
    The reprecussions of this weeks expulsion will be felt in the short-term and especially in the long term. The expulsion and the way it was carried out speedily and without the extreme care that was demanded and warned ahead of time essential, has essentially polarized a large part of Israeli society. The left might think that it is succeeding at destroying the Jewish/religious segregation and defending the secular/elitist control of the country, but the opposite has occured. The farce of Israeli democarcy, legislative system, court system, and media was exposed and is not deniable anymore.
    If there are elections in the future, instead of seeing the trend of larger centralized parties which started in the recent past, you will see the ‘real’ right gain much more power.
    Asaf, enjoy the gloating while you can. We know your breed will soon be extinct.

  14. Asaf,
    You are fully aware that if the “settlers” are not evacuated, and the army withdraws, the arabs would murder, rape and lynch the Jews of Gaza (G-d forbid), and therefore leaving them there is not an option. There is no hypocrisy here on my part because I have always believed that what you call “ethnic cleansing” is a just thing to do against the murderious arab enemy. I am not a leftist, a humanist or whatever you guys call yourself these days and I believe that moving an entire population is sometimes the right thing to do, just as it was done by the Czechs to the Germans right after World War II. If you want blatant hypocrisy, you should look in your own camp where not a word is being said about what obviously can be classified as “ethnic cleansing”. I thought you guys opposed it no matter who it happens to? Where are all the so called human rights activists? Where are all the bleeding hearts?

  15. kAHANE TOLD YOU SO.
    There should be a revolution with the government overthrown since it is undemocratic as they ban the idea of removing arabs from our land which is why this is happening:
    http://www.mechon-mamre.org/e/
    “33,53 And ye shall drive out the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein; for unto you have I given the land to possess it. …33,55 But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you, then shall those that ye let remain of them be as thorns in your eyes, and as pricks in your sides, and they shall harass you in the land wherein ye dwell. 33,56 And it shall come to pass, that as I thought to do unto them, so will I do unto you.”
    –ie Don’t think that you can live there together with the current inhabitants and all will be well. But rather if you do not get rid of them they will begin harassing you. The harassment will continue and magnify until G-d forbid …

  16. the same people advocating transfer are now calling their own situation transfer. Following your own logic, if one ethnic cleansing is alright, whats the biggie if its done to jewish? this is hypocracy.
    Talking about human rights while being the justification for the oppression of the palestinians – that is hypocracy.
    then there is the issue of democracy. The same settlers who have been the pioneers of the undemocratic occupation and the pawns of the undemocratic military regime, are now talking about a faulty democratic process and so on and so forth. this is hypocracy.
    these people’s lifestyle has brought destruction and much pain upon the palestinians. 7000 settlers among more than a million palestinians have brought upon it fragmentation and isolation by barriers and the creation of a military ghetto surrounding. in the west bank, the existence of settlers from the jordan river to the green line has made it impossible to create a real barrier between jews and palestinians, if that was indeed the intended goal. Instead of a wall of security we got a wall of land annexation and land and water theft. The settlers have made it impossible for israel to be a secure place. ironically, originally the argument was that these settlements were for military reasons. now that the military is removing the settlements, we are supposed to be appalled. this is hypocracy.
    I am not putting all the blame on the settlers. It is the governments, both labor and likud who supported the settlements projects all the way through, and now we are paying the price. But i have no pity for them. if i do, its for their children.

  17. asaf, read my top post on o.a.
    while i agree in some capacity, it’s fallacious to suggest that every settler is kahanist advocating transfer. it’s unlikely that even more than a slim minority adovcate transfer.

  18. Asaf,
    You don’t seem to grasp what I’m trying to tell you. Since I am not of a leftist/humanist mindset, I am not one of those who believe that transfer is necessarily illegitimate. I’m not against the disengagement because I believe that moving them because they belong to a certain religion/ethnicity is wrong, I am against it because I believe the land of Israel belongs to the Jews and only to the Jews. The leftists/humanists such as yourself, on the other hand, are the ones who can’t shut up about human rights and how wrong “ethnic cleansing”. You guys seem to be either completely silent about the obvious “violation of human rights” of the “settlers” or you are in fact gloating about it. Now that DEFINES hypocrisy. Let me rephrase this to make it easier for you to understand. I don’t define human rights the way the leftists/secular humanists define it, and I don’t believe that transfer is necessarily wrong. But the leftists/humanists obviously do. Therefore you are hypocritical and I am not.

  19. Very ugly sentiment, josh. Asaf’s “breed” is all of us, you included.
    SheikhYahudi, the fact that the policy — settling Israeli citizens in territories that no Israeli government would ever annex — was never brought before the Israeli electorate in the form of a referrendum to begin with, and now the lack of a referrendum over disengagement is supposed to signal a lack of democracy is enough to saturate the entire settlement policy in hypocrisy.
    Families are leaving homes they built on land beyond the territorial limits of the state that put them there. It’s a hard thing to endure emotionally, but there should be a limit to our sympathies. The settlers must, or at the very least should, have seen it coming from miles away.

  20. Of course, whatever any of us here say, Mobius is absolutely right that the onus is on self-proclaimed progressives — Jewish and otherwise. The peace and human rights movements in particular could prove their genuineness and quit stroking the Arab establishment party line about “Zionist usurpers,” and start pressing for unequivocal recognition of Israel and diplomatic exchanges between Israel and all Arab League member nations.

  21. Zionista,
    You say:
    “settling Israeli citizens in territories that no Israeli government would ever annex”
    That is not true. When the kind of people who are being dragged out of their homes right now (the religious zionists) finally take over the Israeli gov’t (and it will happen due to a variety of reasons, including demographic), they will annex all of Judea, Samaria and Gaza and expel the hostile population. Afterall, Arik Sharon is setting the precedent for what the left calls “ethnic cleansing”. Which brings me to the next point: the hypocrisy I’m alluding to is the hypocrisy of the left which approves a policy of the Israeli gov’t goes against their definition of morality and human rights. You are correct about the lack of democracy that exists in Israel, most of the decision are made without the consent of the Israeli electorate, and that includes both building and removing settlements.
    You say:
    “Families are leaving homes they built on land beyond the territorial limits”
    Who set those limits? The international community? The United Nations? Frankly, their opinion matters as much to me, as that of a self-righteous humanist who vigoursly opposes an “ethnic cleansing” of the Arabs, while vigorously suppurting an “ethnic cleansing” against the Jews.

  22. Zionista,
    I’ll be the first to defend Asaf if his life is in danger. I have no problem going to wherever he might be to save his sorry butt unlike him and his friends who didn’t think our lives were important since we might be somewhere they thought we shouldn’t be.
    Asaf has a jewish (I assume) soul virtually nothing will change that. God commands me to love him unlike him and his breed who have no god to live by.
    The demographic issue is often thrown around. Given his breed’s current birthrates of ‘my israel’ elitists (well, people who think they are elitists), they are essentially commiting demographic suicide (Uri Avnery has no children).

  23. josh, you surprise me.
    Two years ago I was sent like all my friends to army duty. If I would have been drafted I would have been sent to the hills in the middle of nowhere and to the gaza strip (where there are more soldiers than settlers) in order to defend a piece of land. so many soldiers have died in the netzarim checkpoint and gaza strip for no reason at all. If you love your jewish brothers and sisters that much, how come you believe they should risk their lives over a piece of land? Isn’t our life more important than a piece of rock?
    Is it the jewish people that you love or a piece of the earth?

  24. Asaf: “Is it the jewish people that you love or a piece of the earth?”
    In some respect, I think that they are one in the same. What we’re dealing with here is “sacred space.” Gaza is within those borders, if not within the government of Israel’s formal legal jusridiction by any standard of international law (such as it is).
    From where I sit, a huge internal Jewish problem is the reconciliation between the national and religious components of Jewish identity. On the one hand, the Jewish people has the same right of national self-determination as any other peoples who assert those rights. On the other hand, that which has sustained us as a nation over the long period of physical exile (from Israel and Judea) has been the religious component of Jewish identity — in other words, the rabbinate has served as a government-in-exile.
    Eventually, as human civilization advanced to a stage whereby human rights become an issue, the national component of Jewish identity becomes more accessible to subjective political ideas than the theological quality of the religious component. I think it was Sartre that distinguished between classical philosophy in which essence precedes existance and modernity in which existence precedes essence. As a result, the formal social stations of civilization often determined by religion (ie, the divine right of kings) depend less upon theology and more upon the assertion of rights — a relatively new concept in human civilization.
    The problem we have had to face, with varying degrees of progress, is how to advance the national component of Jewish identity without threating the religious component? That Arab/Muslim peoples are going through the same adjustment to modernity even further complicates an already huge problem.

  25. Asaf’s comments are disgusting. It is not a matter of who is right here; it is painful to see people, especially fellow Jews, forcefully removed from their homes even if they had illegally settled on Palestinian land. They had made lives for themselves there, and they made no effort to make life harder for the Palestinians. Someone such as Asaf who claims to be sensitive to suffering everywhere should not be incapable of having sympathy for the people of Gush Katif. Asaf is just cruel and coldhearted, and is not really a humanist as he claims to be.
    I’m in favor of disengagement, but it is like a painful surgery that is necessary to the health of the State of Israel.
    On another topic, Palestinians of Gaza should be a little more sensitive to the pain that Israeli Jews are feeling right now instead of hawking slogans like “Our liberation will not end until we reach Jerusalem.” Even PA officials are promoting these slogans. I understand that they feel like they are being freed from oppression, but you don’t celebrate someone else’s suffering. Where’s the sympathy? I don’t feel like they are really recognizing how much of a painful sacrifice this is for us, even if they have been wronged.
    Hamas of course is exploiting this as a victory so that they can attract more followers and promote their message of hate. These people are preventing good from coming out of disengagement. What Palestinians should do is hold off the celebrations for now and focus on building a state that can contribute to the int’l community and be a good neighbor to Israel. But their behavior now makes this seem like wishful thinking.

  26. Wow, I am really supposed to feel sorry for upper middle class anglo saxon born again racists who live in mansions conusming 60 percent of the water and shooting down olive trees (which is one of the only sources of income for the Arabs) being protected by lower class Druze and Sephardic/Mizrachi soldiers while millions of Arabs are dirt poor. Of course it is hard to see the drama but these people have lived off of the Israeli taxpayer and now spit on the soldiers trying to use psychological warfare and engaging in illegal behavior. If this is what Judaism stands for …. I don’t want a part of it

  27. I have some sympathy for the settlers – but these calls, these DEMANDS that we all weep for them, are getting to be a bit much. The Palestinians in Gaza outnumber the settlers by orders of magnitude, and none of the people who go on and on about how painful the disengagement is had a whit of sympathy for the stunted and corraled lives of these people whom the Israeli state treated like cattle. I’m sorry anyone has to leave their home but there is no comparison between what the settlers are going through now and what more than a million Palestinians have had to endure for the last 30 years.

  28. “On another topic, Palestinians of Gaza should be a little more sensitive to the pain that Israeli Jews are feeling right now instead of hawking slogans like “Our liberation will not end until we reach Jerusalem.” ”
    Matt, you’re asking the prisoners of a ghetto to be sensitive to their jailers. I think this whole spectacle could have been avoided and is part of sharon’s circus to create a “trauma” for israeli society so we’ll never face another “disengagement”. you expect me to take part in the spectacle as a spectator- to shed tears, to feel sympathy. no thanks. this is a big show, and the settlers are responsible to their own situation.
    im happy you got your catharsis.

  29. I have sympathy for people who genuinely feel pain since they genuinely feel pain. In other words those kids that are crying have been brainwashed (as have many of the older settlers) and truely believe that they are in the right. Nevermind that millions of palestinians live in a state of complete destruction because a few thousand self proclaimed chosen Brooklynites came to live in mansions in paradise. Sometimes us Jews cannot see through the prism of universal ethics and humanity which is unfortunate because I genuinely believe that we do hold many moral values. There is a populace in Israel that HAS reached its hand out and helped the Palestinians. The settlers have also engaged in colonialist rhetoric accusing millions of Palestinians as being de facto terrorists in order to alleviate any need of thinking about the Arabs who constitute millions of people in the Middle East. You can’t live in a bubble forever and the settlers are waking up to a reality that does not include gangster children with yarmulkes capturing hilltops. The settlement thinktanks even tried to engineer a massive aliyah of questionable Jews from India JUST in order to create even further supremacy over the questionable land.
    I think the height of shame was the comparisons to the Holocaust. Nevermind that they are living extravagantly but also receiving thousands of shekels in compensation. These soldiers that have to protect the few families that live there for 3 year mandatory service! If I ever had a little bit of sympathy it was washed away with that idiotic equation. I am a grandson of Holocaust survivors and I abhor the comparison.

  30. a simple question when viewing the above thread: who speaks with love in their heart for their fellow jew, and who is acid tounged? and who would you rather spend your time with in a marriage, a partnership, a shul, a town, eternity? I suggest everyone who has posted here and those reading the posts view each post from that perspective, some introspection might be in order (and might save shrink bills and lead to happier lives).

  31. avi green, here are samplings are your past posts. i wonder if you were speaking with love when writing these things:
    “traitor”, “you disgusting little cretin”, “you are scum”, “please keep on with your muslim conversion lessions” “go back to your burka fitting”
    sounds to me like a very hateful person who doesnt like when people disagree with u. shame. i dont remember josh talking like this and hes very close to your side of the political map.

  32. Asaf,
    you fail to surprise me anymore. Two years ago, you could have been drafted and there was a good chance that you wouldn’t have to serve in the territories. But you chose instead to ‘refuse’ to serve adn you gave up your obligation to defend Jews wherever they buy land, or wherever the government sends them to live for strategic reasons.
    If you love your jewish brothers and sisters that much, how come you believe they should risk their lives over a piece of land? Isn’t our life more important than a piece of rock?
    If someone has disengaged, it is people like you who chose to listen to like-minded people who’ve rarely mingled with religious Jews and instead have refused to listen to the right-wing warnings. I do not deny that the struggle to stay in Gaza was to save settler homes. That is only typical of the superficial and one-dimensional attitude you give us settlers.
    The struggle to stay in Gaza primarily dealth with, among other things:
    -not retreating unlitarely,
    -not retreating under fire,
    -not creating an admitted and proven terrorist haven next door so close to population centres,
    -not creating a jew-free land,
    -not creating a precedent that a jew buying private land (as opposed to state land) can be removed from that land for political reasons,
    -to dismiss the idea that a border will give us justification to defend ourselves in the future,
    -the loss of equal civil rights,
    -the lies distributed by the media,
    -the police brutality,
    -the holiness of living in Israel.
    Listen again, retreating from Gaza has given the Arabs, who want us kicked out entirely from Israel, justification that they are on the right track. If Jews being stubborn and staying on rocks is the price to ensure that the enemy stays farther away, then, yes, lives should be risked in order to save more lives. Wake up there has been a war going on the last fire years: 1000 Jews have been killed, 5000 have been injured and maimed. I am afraid for what the future beholds. Running from Gaza with our tail between our legs is a recipe for disaster.
    gal friedlander,
    I have no doubt that I will get no where with you. It is evident by your immature ignorance that you have no idea who settlers are, what kind of housing situations settlers face, and who really serves in the army.
    being protected by lower class Druze and Sephardic/Mizrachi soldiers
    Thank you for confirming that a) white ashkenaz participation in the army is dropping, your ignorance of stigmatizing druze and sefaradim as lower class which is a very bad generalization that frankly harms your credibility.
    Come back after you’ve taken a public bus or served in the army. There’s more to Israel than driving around with the windows up and the air-conditioning on.

  33. First you, Gal. Way to characterize ALL settlers as racist American immigrants. Do you have any idea why a large number of Israelis moved to settlements in the first place? The Israeli government made lucrative offers of affordable housing within commuting distance of major cities like Tel-Aviv and J’lem. And I know some of the “born again Brooklynites,” as you disparagingly call them. Guess what? Quite a number of them were born in Israel and harbor no ill feelings at all toward Palestinians. Do the right wing Americans whom you refer to exist? Without a doubt. Do they represent all Jews in disputed territories? Hell no. I am disgusted by their actions and beliefs as you are, but I surely do not hate them as you do. I’m not wild about their attacks on Palestinians, their disrespect of the Israeli soldiers (among them Ashkenazis, ignorant fuck) protecting them, and their blatant disregard for law. But they may very well make up a minority of settlers. The next time you have the gall to call someone racist, watch your own comments for blanket generalizations. Israeli society is not some hierarchy in which class rank is determined by skin color. You remind me of that anti-Semitic Irish poet who said that Americans who move to the West Bank are like Nazis and deserve to be shot.
    Another thing: I have no idea where you pulled out the idea that settlers caused all Palestinians to be labeled “de facto terrorists.” Palestinian militants who kill innocent Israelis are appropriately called terrorists. On the other hand, it is possible that you see such acts as resistance.
    Asaf: I’m not comparing Israeli pains with Palestinian suffering. Such a comparison is morally wrong. Like I said, even if Israel has been in the wrong, it is still making a painful concession. It is nothing like stopping terrorism, which should be a given. In case you haven’t been paying attention to events, soldiers are tearfully removing crying settlers, while Palestinians are cheering as Israel goes through this arduous process. Suffering should not be measured relatively. I understand that a few thousand Israelis are living in a quarter of Gaza while over a million Palestinians are packed into the rest. And it wasn’t worth the lives of the Israeli soldiers either. But messages of victory only convey the message that violence is the way to accomplish goals. Palestinians should be happy about fewer restrictions on their lives and their upcoming independence, but they appear to be cheering their enemy’s downfall. This type of thinking will only hinder peace. But like I said, it could be naive to believe that Israelis and Palestinians could truly live in piece alongside each other.

  34. asaf, thanks for reminding me of my prior posts, they made me smile (im sure you could have found stronger ones and im sure you provoked them; i left this site several months ago, and when i returned it seemed that everyone was more moderate and even you were not posting vile comments about israel; and thats how its been the last few weeks; this particular thread seems to be one of the few teetering over the edge, hence my comment. and if you wouldn’t want to be in the same village as me, stay put. and, im willing to live by the same standard as i suggest applying above.

  35. I fucking hate AP, all the jews to them are settler and all the palestinians are refugees…
    I hate that we have to give our land back to these people

  36. dan man- yes i cry. I cry because I haven’t done enough. How can I blame others, when I myself could have done more. But what about tomm.?? The day after the, when the teas of a country continue to be wept in homes of friends? And I, I sit in FL preparing to teach Jewish children. My family is growing, my debit is too and I am worried. We are a people of hope, and yet even I in my position of inspiration find my self searching. I truly did not think it would go down like this…I still don’t. Dan and friends… wait and see, the days that follow will be trying and telling. A war is upon us. A war of love or a war of hate- this I do not know. But it does not end here. Israel was not rebuilt to be shown off for 50yrs and then taken down like a SymCity. Pray, act, and pray somemore. Charity (in all forms) cancels out G-d’s decrees. Stay safe O Israel…wherever you may be, and bring us home…to all your cities.

  37. The problem is Asaf, Green and other together with the AP and anti-Jewish wolrd media.
    They compare as equal the righteous and the wicked; the just and the unjust.
    There is a difference between throwing arabs out and throwing Jews out:
    a. The land belongs to the Jewish people. It was given by our G-d to our forfathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We lived there for close to 2500 years. We were forcibly moved out. Jews werre there in small numbers throughout. The land went from one dominion to another while it lay fallow. Arab from the neighboring areas roamed in and lived in some areas but in general the land was empty.
    Now by G-d’s grace we have come back.
    –the land is ours.
    b. The arabs intention is the destruction of Israel.
    Punishing enemies who intend hard is not the same as focing out innocent people only becasue of the pressure of the murderous arabs.
    Throwing someone out of their home and throwing someone else out of their home is NOT ALWAYS EQUAL.
    But to these enemies (asaf, green , AP …) of the Jewish people everything is equal- the good and the bad.

  38. actually avi, we were never forced to move out. we, according to talmud, sinned gravely, and were punished for it. israel was laid to waste by an invading army. afterwards, there was no means to stay afloat here. no farms, no food, no economy. so we left. we went into exile. but no one ever prevented us from returning here and settling the land until the white paper. up until that point, in the course of 2000 years, we could’ve returned at any given point, but we didn’t. why? because layin’ up in babylon’s a lot cushier than trying to turn a malarial swamp into an orange grove. being in exile was our decision, not anyone else’s.
    also, in terms of the land being empty, think in terms of the vast expensive of syria, lebanon, israel and jordan. you had various tribes and peoples scattered throughout the land. so what if they hadn’t paved the entire country! the idea of like, settling every single inch of land is a new and modern, post-industrial concept. people used to believe in the idea of open space. and it was because there was a countryside that wasn’t obscured by electrical wires, highways, and highrises, that they felt a deep connection to the land and grew to love it. saying, “they didn’t destroy the country like we have” isn’t an excuse to say, “it wasn’t their land.”

  39. avigreen: “The land belongs to the Jewish people. It was given by our G-d to our forfathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We lived there for close to 2500 years. We were forcibly moved out.”
    mobius: “actually avi, we were never forced to move out. we, according to talmud, sinned gravely, and were punished for it.”
    See where theology gets us? We are so enamored with our own narratives that we lose our grip on a matter of uncomplicated justice, and invite the dismissal of the rest of the world. This is not a case of a “shonda fur di goyim.” It’s about being smart and frank. There is a solid historical and arcaeological record supporting Jewish national rights in Israel. We can wisely and effectively assert our national legitimacy in language that is universally understood, or we can go on trotting out a religious dogma that the rest of the world has never understood and probably never will.

  40. Zionista you’re making a mistake.
    Most of the world does understand the promise to our fathers. The most popular book is the bible. Don’t kid yourself.
    Anyway what is the historical record if not the record of Abraham isaac Jacob Moses sinai the prophets the holy temple….
    Ignoring it and using nationalistic reasons doesn’t put us above the arabs in terms of rights.
    Only Jews who are full of self-guilt have a problem with the covenant- most gentiles understand it very well.

  41. I’ve heard some other myths about the US being inhabited by another race, the so-called Indians of North America. Very little evidence for this, you’d basically have to go on an acheological dig to find it.

  42. “First you, Gal. Way to characterize ALL settlers as racist American immigrants. Do you have any idea why a large number of Israelis moved to settlements in the first place? The Israeli government made lucrative offers of affordable housing within commuting distance of major cities like Tel-Aviv and J’lem.”
    I wasn’t aware that you lack the ability to read between the lines. Yes I should have qualified my remarks. Many of the extreme settlers, the ones who kill Arabs, the ones who threw acidic liquid on soldiers and the ones who camp out in areas that have millions of Arabs (such as Chevron) and engage in outright intimidation are born again Messianic zealots, many of them Americans.
    “And I know some of the “born again Brooklynites,” as you disparagingly call them. Guess what? Quite a number of them were born in Israel and harbor no ill feelings at all toward Palestinians.”
    By definition a born again Brooklynite is someone who was not born in Israel. Otherwise he would be called a born again Israeli, right?
    ” I’m not wild about their attacks on Palestinians, their disrespect of the Israeli soldiers (among them Ashkenazis, ignorant fuck) ”
    Again I did not say that Ashkenazim do not serve in the army (my sister does for example). What I am saying is that it is well known that a disproportionate number of lower class Mizrachim serve in the combat units…. just like blacks are funneled into the combat units in the U.S. army.
    “The next time you have the gall to call someone racist, watch your own comments for blanket generalizations.”
    I can say with a large degree of confidence that many settlers are racist and believe in the inferiority of Arabs/Muslims. Even if they did not believe this, their actions speak for themselves…. going into inhabited land as the chosen people in order to bring the Messiah and the third temple. It is very hard to engage in dialogue with people who are that delusional.
    ” Israeli society is not some hierarchy in which class rank is determined by skin color.”
    This is obviously absurd for anyone who has any idea of the history of Mizrachi immigration and the abject poverty that many of them live in. Not denying that there has been improvement, but this is still a historical scar of a few generations ago. Also many Mizrachi Jews lived quiet nicely in the Arab countries so its not like their hatred of Arabs is innate. They were propogandized into this type of hatred in “divide and conquer” fashion .
    “You remind me of that anti-Semitic Irish poet who said that Americans who move to the West Bank are like Nazis and deserve to be shot.”
    I never said that the settlers are Nazis or that they should be shot. I vehemently disagree with both statements. That does not mean that I don’t see them as racist/arrogant/delusio nal/extreme/irresponsib le and violent.
    “Another thing: I have no idea where you pulled out the idea that settlers caused all Palestinians to be labeled “de facto terrorists.” Palestinian militants who kill innocent Israelis are appropriately called terrorists. On the other hand, it is possible that you see such acts as resistance.”
    Again do not put words into my mouth. I am very much against the terrorist attacks on both sides. The settlers rhetoric towards the Arabs is racist and disgusting. They are constantly called a “fifth column”, they are called terrorists regardless of whether they are accomodating or not. The settler movement is interested in demonizing them just like other European colonialists demonized the local people in Iraq, India, South Africa, and even the U.S.A. Its the same termonology – these people are subhuman, barbarians, etc. If this is not straight out of the colonialist handbook I don’t know what is.
    At the end of the day there are too many geopolitical factors that have to be taken into consideration before a few thousand weirdos who think they are on the brink of redemption. There is oil…. over 1 billion muslims. Israel can’t and shouldn’t stand up against 1 billion muslims for a long time. Its the same “the whole world against us” mentality that the settler movement likes to perpetuate. At some stage even us Jews have to be held accountable to universal codes of morality that dictate that you cannot just build some type of bubble in the Middle East and be oblivious to millions and millions of Arabs…making ad hominem attacks on them. Its just not possible….

  43. gal friedlander,
    “I have no doubt that I will get no where with you. It is evident by your immature ignorance that you have no idea who settlers are, what kind of housing situations settlers face, and who really serves in the army.”
    I have a very good idea who the settlers are. In fact I have visited Shomron a couple of times and my parents many times. Is there some secret ingredient that I did not confront that makes these people beyond mere mortals? Please enlighten me. Yes there are settlers who went their for pragmatic reasons (financial for example). But the more extreme hardcore settlers come from a very specific mix of religion, nationalism and messianism. There is no denying this.
    “being protected by lower class Druze and Sephardic/Mizrachi soldiers
    Thank you for confirming that a) white ashkenaz participation in the army is dropping, your ignorance of stigmatizing druze and sefaradim as lower class which is a very bad generalization that frankly harms your credibility.”
    You are really exposing your own ignorance. The class that people belong to is not something that is open to much interpretation. One just can take a look at the census bureau and make a very quick/easy analysis based on income. I guarantee you that Arabs/Druze/Mizrachi are very much disproportionately represented in the lower class. In fact for a long period till about the 80s with Begin Sephardim were aggresively funnelled to the menial level jobs. A class based analysis cannot be ignored here.
    “Come back after you’ve taken a public bus or served in the army. There’s more to Israel than driving around with the windows up and the air-conditioning on.”
    If we told people that they should only post an opinion if they have been at the place we would not have the New York Times editorial and NO Floridian would be able to comment on 9-11 since they were not there. I have lived in Israel some of my life, my father and sister served in the army…. and even if it was not the case this is all irrelevant.

  44. to all the people that believe that the settlers had no right to be in gaza:
    israeli won the 6 day war. inclcuded in this ‘prize’ was gaza. in 67 the IDF made a grave mistake of not kicking the arabs out of what are now called the ‘occupied territories’. the settlers have every right to be in gaza because the whole land of Israle belongs to the nation of Israel. The settlers are israels securuty fence, if they wont be there, where will the rockets fall? this plan is stupid. its an ethnic cleansing and it B”H wont go ahead.

  45. gal friedlander: “Its the same termonology – these people are subhuman, barbarians, etc. If this is not straight out of the colonialist handbook I don’t know what is.”
    Then you don’t know what it is, because indigenous peoples are not immune from racism/tribalism — ie, Rwanda, Sudan/Darfur, etc. Or the idea that one Jewish state is too many while 22 Arab states are not enough. In the great pagentry of human nature, European imperialism is of only one small piece.
    You’re sorta right about one aspect of our particular problem, though. Fundamentalists commonly share the outlook that Arab and Jewish national rights are mutually exclusive.

  46. Joe Schmo: “Anyway what is the historical record if not the record of Abraham isaac Jacob Moses sinai the prophets the holy temple…. ”
    It is one account of history. The overall historical record, meanwhile, depends on third party verification in primary sources. We’re covered there too, thanks to the archaeological record.
    (Cont’d): “Ignoring it and using nationalistic reasons doesn’t put us above the arabs in terms of rights.”
    It doesn’t have to. It only has to put us at equal terms with them. The Kurds, Berbers, etc. can assert theirs on their own, and perhaps have our support when and if they do.
    (Cont’d): “Only Jews who are full of self-guilt have a problem with the covenant- most gentiles understand it very well.”
    They understand it very differently than we do. That’s why they redacted our scriptures and pronounced it an “Old Testament.” In their subjective truth, we abrogated that covenant when we allegedly killed the messiah, remember? Out theologies are fundamentally at odds, and you make our legitmate national rights dependent on theology at our own peril.

  47. I have no sympathy whatsoever for settlers; every settlement is a warcrime & every settler a warcrimminal.
    Free Palestine!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.